A.I.M. Holding Company
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, A.i.m. ranks #38,650 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #38,650
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 49th percentile
- by Innovation Score (34.8/100)
- 13.5
- avg claims per patent
- +100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R38650 · US Corporation #38,650 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #38,650/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH A C Dandy Products
- CPC-NARROW H02K · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 34.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 13.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: A. C. Dandy Products Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How A.i.m.’s 34.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around A.i.m.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- A I M Holding · this assignee
A I M Holding · this assignee
35 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows A.i.m.'s Innovation Score is 34.8/100 (49th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for A.i.m.?
Each dot is one of A.i.m.’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). A.i.m.’s own 13.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where A.i.m.'s grants concentrate
A.I.M. Holding Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines). By volume, A.i.m. sits between A-Life Medical, LLC and Aarjay Products, LLC.
A.i.m.'s three-year grant acceleration
A.I.M. Holding Company shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at AIM's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- A-life Medical
A-Life Medical, LLC
6 patents
- A C Dandy Products
A. C. Dandy Products Ltd.
6 patents
- A Richard Tools
A. Richard Tools Co.
6 patents
- A A G Stucchi S R…
A.A.G. Stucchi S.R.L.
6 patents
- A2 Surgical
A2 Surgical
6 patents
- AAF
AAF Ltd
6 patents
- AAR Manufacturing
AAR Manufacturing, Inc.
6 patents
- Aarjay Products
Aarjay Products, LLC
6 patents
- A I M Holding ◀
A.I.M. Holding Company
6 patents
What this shows A.I.M. holds 6 patents at rank #38,514, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near AIM
By rank, the assignees closest to #38,514 in granted patent volume.
- A-Life Medical, LLC #38,510 · 6 patents
- A. C. Dandy Products Ltd. #38,511 · 6 patents
- A. Richard Tools Co. #38,512 · 6 patents
- A.A.G. Stucchi S.R.L. #38,513 · 6 patents
- A2 Surgical #38,515 · 6 patents
- AAF Ltd #38,516 · 6 patents
- AAR Manufacturing, Inc. #38,517 · 6 patents
- Aarjay Products, LLC #38,518 · 6 patents
Leaders in H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in AIM's primary technology class.
A.i.m.'s Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
35 49th percentile higher than 49% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2022 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2023 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2024 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does A.I.M. Holding Company patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
A.I.M. Holding Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- A.I.M. Holding Company's lead technology class is H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H02K
- Ranked #38,650 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare A.I.M. Holding Company against A-Life Medical, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 34.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.