AFC Trident, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2016. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H05K (Printed CIRCUITS; Casings OR Constructional Details OF Electric APPARATUS; Manufacture OF Assemblages OF Electrical Components).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, AFC ranks #30,763 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #30,763
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 11th percentile
- by Innovation Score (22.6/100)
- 8.4
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R30763 · US Corporation #30,763 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #30,763/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Advanced Track & Trace
- CPC-NARROW H05K · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 22.6/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 8.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Advanced Track & Trace (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How AFC’s 22.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around AFC
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- AFC Trident · this assignee 23
AFC Trident · this assignee
23 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows AFC's Innovation Score is 22.6/100 (11th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for AFC?
Each dot is one of AFC’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). AFC’s own 8.4 claims/patent is at or below the 9.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where AFC's grants concentrate
AFC Trident, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 25% of grants classified under H05K (Printed CIRCUITS; Casings OR Constructional Details OF Electric APPARATUS; Manufacture OF Assemblages OF Electrical Components). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (6 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2016. By volume, AFC sits between Advanced Track & Trace and Agro-kanesho Co., Ltd..
Who files at AFC's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Advanced Track &…
Advanced Track & Trace
8 patents
- Aegis Spine
Aegis Spine, Inc.
8 patents
- Aerpio Pharmaceut…
Aerpio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
8 patents
- Aetrex
Aetrex, Inc.
8 patents
- Agco A/S
Agco A/S
8 patents
- Agilyx
Agilyx Corporation
8 patents
- Agnes Medical
Agnes Medical Co., Ltd.
8 patents
- Agro-kanesho
Agro-kanesho Co., Ltd.
8 patents
- AFC Trident ◀
AFC Trident, Inc.
8 patents
What this shows AFC holds 8 patents at rank #30,739, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near AFC
By rank, the assignees closest to #30,739 in granted patent volume.
- Advanced Track & Trace #30,735 · 8 patents
- Aegis Spine, Inc. #30,736 · 8 patents
- Aerpio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. #30,737 · 8 patents
- Aetrex, Inc. #30,738 · 8 patents
- Agco A/S #30,740 · 8 patents
- Agilyx Corporation #30,741 · 8 patents
- Agnes Medical Co., Ltd. #30,742 · 8 patents
- Agro-kanesho Co., Ltd. #30,743 · 8 patents
Leaders in H05K (Printed Circuits)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in AFC's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 3,596 in class
- International Business Machines Corporation 1,469 in class
- Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 1,201 in class
- Intel Corporation 1,132 in class
- Apple Inc. 1,082 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 1,004 in class
- Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. 712 in class
- Fuji Corporation 662 in class
AFC's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 11th percentile higher than 11% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 6 | 75.0% |
| 2016 | 2 | 25.0% |
Which technologies does AFC Trident, Inc. patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
AFC Trident, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- AFC Trident, Inc.'s lead technology class is H05K (Printed CIRCUITS; Casings OR Constructional Details OF Electric APPARATUS; Manufacture OF Assemblages OF Electrical Components), 25% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H05K
- Ranked #30,763 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare AFC Trident, Inc. against Advanced Track & Trace, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 22.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.