USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

AFC Trident, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2016. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H05K (Printed CIRCUITS; Casings OR Constructional Details OF Electric APPARATUS; Manufacture OF Assemblages OF Electrical Components).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, AFC ranks #30,763 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 8 technology areas.

#30,763
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
11th percentile
by Innovation Score (22.6/100)
8.4
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R30763 · US Corporation #30,763 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
  • MID-PACK #30,763/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Advanced Track & Trace
  • CPC-NARROW H05K · 8 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 22.6/100
  • CLAIMS-PAR 8.4 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Advanced Track & Trace (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How AFC’s 22.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around AFC

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows AFC's Innovation Score is 22.6/100 (11th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for AFC?

Each dot is one of AFC’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). AFC’s own 8.4 claims/patent is at or below the 9.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

AFC vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 8.088.1 051015202530 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Advanced Track & Trace - 8, 13.38Advanced Track &…Aegis Spine, Inc. - 8, 5.62Aegis SpineAerpio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - 8, 25.25Aerpio Pharmaceut…Aetrex, Inc. - 8, 15.12AetrexAgco A/S - 8, 9Agco A/SAgilyx Corporation - 8, 15.62AgilyxAgnes Medical Co., Ltd. - 8, 6.88Agnes MedicalAgro-kanesho Co., Ltd. - 8, 7.25Agro-kaneshoAFC Trident, Inc. - 8, 8.38AFC Trident
AFC vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where AFC's grants concentrate

AFC Trident, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 25% of grants classified under H05K (Printed CIRCUITS; Casings OR Constructional Details OF Electric APPARATUS; Manufacture OF Assemblages OF Electrical Components). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (6 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2016. By volume, AFC sits between Advanced Track & Trace and Agro-kanesho Co., Ltd..

Who files at AFC's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows AFC holds 8 patents at rank #30,739, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near AFC

By rank, the assignees closest to #30,739 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H05K (Printed Circuits)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in AFC's primary technology class.

AFC's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

23 11th percentile higher than 11% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

1234567 20152016 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2016

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
AFC Trident, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 6 75.0%
2016 2 25.0%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

AFC Trident, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • AFC Trident, Inc.'s lead technology class is H05K (Printed CIRCUITS; Casings OR Constructional Details OF Electric APPARATUS; Manufacture OF Assemblages OF Electrical Components), 25% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H05K
  • Ranked #30,763 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare AFC Trident, Inc. against Advanced Track & Trace, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 22.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.