Aeeg AB
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Aeeg ranks #34,099 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #34,099
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 17th percentile
- by Innovation Score (25.4/100)
- 20.1
- avg claims per patent
- +33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R34099 · Foreign Corporation #34,099 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #34,099/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Adva Biotechnology
- CPC-NARROW A61B · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 25.4/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 20.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-UP +33% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Adva Biotechnology Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Aeeg’s 25.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Aeeg
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Aeeg AB · this assignee 25
Aeeg AB · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Aeeg's Innovation Score is 25.4/100 (17th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Aeeg?
Each dot is one of Aeeg’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Aeeg’s own 20.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Aeeg's grants concentrate
Aeeg AB is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Aeeg sits between Adva Biotechnology Ltd. and Afinitica Technologies, S. L..
Who files at Aeeg's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Adva Biotechnology
Adva Biotechnology Ltd.
7 patents
- Advance Denki Kog…
Advance Denki Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
7 patents
- Advanced Plating
Advanced Plating, Inc.
7 patents
- Advanced Processo…
Advanced Processor Architectures, LLC
7 patents
- Aegis Medical Inn…
Aegis Medical Innovations Inc.
7 patents
- Afag Holding
Afag Holding AG
7 patents
- Affective Software
Affective Software, Inc.
7 patents
- Afinitica S L
Afinitica Technologies, S. L.
7 patents
- Aeeg AB ◀
Aeeg AB
7 patents
What this shows Aeeg holds 7 patents at rank #34,075, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Aeeg
By rank, the assignees closest to #34,075 in granted patent volume.
- Adva Biotechnology Ltd. #34,071 · 7 patents
- Advance Denki Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha #34,072 · 7 patents
- Advanced Plating, Inc. #34,073 · 7 patents
- Advanced Processor Architectures, LLC #34,074 · 7 patents
- Aegis Medical Innovations Inc. #34,076 · 7 patents
- Afag Holding AG #34,077 · 7 patents
- Affective Software, Inc. #34,078 · 7 patents
- Afinitica Technologies, S. L. #34,079 · 7 patents
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Aeeg's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
Aeeg's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 17th percentile higher than 17% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2017 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2020 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2021 | 2 | 28.6% |
Which technologies does Aeeg AB patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Aeeg AB's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Aeeg AB's lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #34,099 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Aeeg AB against Adva Biotechnology Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 25.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.