Where does Actiwave AB rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Actiwave AB ranks #38,561 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Actiwave AB hold?

Actiwave AB holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2016, spanning 9 technology areas.

What is Actiwave AB's Innovation Score?

Actiwave AB has an Innovation Score of 29.2 out of 100 (30th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Actiwave AB focus on?

Actiwave AB's top technology area is H03M (CODING; DECODING; Code Conversion IN General) with 4 patents, ranking #323 of 1,072 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 9 CPC subclasses total.

Is Actiwave AB's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Actiwave AB's recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Actiwave AB's patents?

Actiwave AB's patents average 19.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Actiwave AB patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Actiwave AB

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2016. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H03M (CODING; DECODING; Code Conversion IN General).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Actiwave ranks #38,561 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 9 technology areas.

#38,561
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 30th percentile
by Innovation Score (29.2/100): 19.8
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R38561 · Foreign Corporation #38,561 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #38,561/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Action Sports…
CPC-NARROW H03M · 9 areas
INNOV-THIN 29.2/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.8 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Action Sports Equipment Pty Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Actiwave’s 29.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (23%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 10.6 pts (36%) Claim depth 11.9 pts (41%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Actiwave AB · this assignee

29
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Actiwave's Innovation Score is 29.2/100 (30th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Actiwave?

Each dot is one of Actiwave’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Actiwave’s own 19.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Actiwave vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Actiwave's grants concentrate

Actiwave AB is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under H03M (CODING; DECODING; Code Conversion IN General). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (4 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2015. By volume, Actiwave sits between Action Sports Equipment Pty Ltd. and Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc..

Action Sports Equ…

6
Actioniq

6
Activate Games

6
Active-semi (BVI)

6
Acumen Design Ass…

6
Acumen Pharmaceut…

6
Adsupply

6
Adamas Pharmaceut…

6
Actiwave AB ◀

6

What this shows Actiwave holds 6 patents at rank #38,777, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Actiwave

By rank, the assignees closest to #38,777 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H03M (Coding)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Actiwave's primary technology class.

Actiwave's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

29 30th percentile higher than 30% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2016

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Actiwave AB patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	33.3%
2016	4	66.7%

Which technologies does Actiwave AB patent most?

H03M - CODING; DECODING; Code Conversion IN General 4

H03L - Automatic Control, Starting, Synchronisation OR Stabilisation OF Generators OF Electronic Oscillations OR Pulses 2

H03H - Impedance Networks, e.g. Resonant CIRCUITS; Resonators 2

H03K - Pulse Technique 2

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 2

H04R - Loudspeakers, Microphones, Gramophone Pick-ups OR Like Acoustic Electromechanical TRANSDUCERS; Deaf-aid SETS; Public Address Systems 2

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 1

G10H - Electrophonic Musical INSTRUMENTS; Instruments IN Which THE Tones ARE Generated BY Electromechanical Means OR Electronic Generators, OR IN Which THE Tones ARE Synthesised From A Data Store 1

H03G - Control OF Amplification 1

Top 9 of 9 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Actiwave AB's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Actiwave AB's lead technology class is H03M (CODING; DECODING; Code Conversion IN General), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H03M
Ranked #38,561 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Actiwave AB against Action Sports Equipment Pty Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 29.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.