USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

2nd Skull, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A42B (HATS; Head Coverings).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, 2nd ranks #25,616 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 9 technology areas.

#25,616
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 15%
by Innovation Score (49.1/100)
17.1
avg claims per patent
+133%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R25616 · US Corporation #25,616 · 10 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
  • MID-PACK #25,616/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH 1globe Biomedical
  • CPC-NARROW A42B · 9 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 49.1/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 17.1 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-SURGE +133% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: 1globe Biomedical Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How 2nd’s 49.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around 2nd

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows 2nd's Innovation Score is 49.1/100 (top 15% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for 2nd?

Each dot is one of 2nd’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). 2nd’s own 17.1 claims/patent is at or below the 19.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

2nd vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 9.99.91010.1 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent 1globe Biomedical Co., Ltd. - 10, 14.41globe Biomedical1Q, LLC - 10, 19.61Q1ST Biotherapeutics, Inc. - 10, 191ST Biotherapeuti…1st Defence Industries Ltd. - 10, 11st Defence Indus…3D Plus - 10, 7.33D Plus410 Medical, Inc. - 10, 23.9410 Medical4DS Memory, Limited - 10, 23.24DS Memory7Tunnels Inc. - 10, 22.77tunnels2nd Skull, Inc. - 10, 17.12nd Skull
2nd vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where 2nd's grants concentrate

2nd Skull, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 70% of grants classified under A42B (HATS; Head Coverings). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, 2nd sits between 1globe Biomedical Co., Ltd. and 7Tunnels Inc..

2nd's three-year grant acceleration

2nd Skull, Inc. shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at 2nd's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows 2nd holds 10 patents at rank #25,616, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near 2nd

By rank, the assignees closest to #25,616 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A42B (HATS)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in 2nd's primary technology class.

2nd's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

49 Top 15% higher than 85% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.5 2015201720192020202220232024 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
2nd Skull, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 10.0%
2017 1 10.0%
2019 1 10.0%
2020 1 10.0%
2022 2 20.0%
2023 2 20.0%
2024 2 20.0%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

2nd Skull, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • 2nd Skull, Inc.'s lead technology class is A42B (HATS; Head Coverings), 70% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A42B
  • Ranked #25,616 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare 2nd Skull, Inc. against 1globe Biomedical Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 49.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.