CPC technology class · G09

G09D — Railway OR LIKE TIME OR FARE Tables

Railway or like time or fare tables; perpetual calendars. 9 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year filing trajectory.

9
US patents granted
G09
Parent CPC class
2
Active assignees
-87%
5-yr velocity

CPC subclass G09D — RAILWAY OR LIKE TIME OR FARE TABLES; PERPETUAL CALENDARS — covers 9 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records. This subclass sits within the broader CPC class G09 (EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS), one of roughly 250 top-level technology categories in the Cooperative Patent Classification system jointly maintained by the USPTO and the European Patent Office. At the subclass level, four-character codes like G09D give the most practical resolution for tracking a specific technology domain without losing sight of adjacent filings. Every grant here has been classified by a USPTO examiner based on the technical disclosure in the patent specification.

The competitive landscape in G09D is shaped by 2 distinct companies actively filing in this space. International Business Machines Corporation leads with 2 patents, followed by UNIBIND LIMITED at 10 grants. Concentration at the top of the leaderboard indicates whether this technology area is dominated by a handful of incumbents or fragmented across many filers — a useful signal for investors evaluating competitive moats and for product teams mapping freedom-to-operate risk.

Filing trajectory matters as much as static counts. The yearly series on this page plots grants from 2015 through 2025, highlighting whether innovation in G09D is accelerating, plateauing, or cooling. Technology areas with rising post-2020 activity often reflect emerging markets or new platform shifts, while declining filings can signal mature domains where incremental improvement has slowed. Researchers, licensing professionals, and competitive-intelligence teams use these patterns — together with the top-assignee distribution — to decide where to invest, where to license, and where to avoid entanglement. All counts on this page come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.

Is G09D innovation accelerating?

US utility-patent grants per year in G09D, 2015–2025 — recent five years are down 87% versus 2015–2019.

012345 20152016201720182023 1

Who leads G09D?

The 12 most active assignees in RAILWAY OR LIKE TIME OR FARE TABLES; PERPETUAL CALENDARS — wider bars mean more grants

patents

What this shows International Busines… is the most active filer in G09D, holding 2 of the 9 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.

Source USPTO PatentsView — granted utility patents As of 2015–2025 grant years
View data table
Top patent holders in CPC subclass G09D
Rank Company Patents in G09D
#1 Progressive International Corp. 109
#2 UNIBIND LIMITED 10

About This Class

CPC subclass G09D belongs to class G09.

9 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.

2 companies actively patent in this space.

Classification System

Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CPC class G09D?
CPC subclass G09D covers RAILWAY OR LIKE TIME OR FARE TABLES; PERPETUAL CALENDARS. It belongs to CPC class G09 (EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS). The Cooperative Patent Classification is a hierarchical system used by the USPTO and European Patent Office to categorize patents by technology.
How many patents have been filed in G09D?
9 US utility patents were granted in CPC subclass G09D between 2015 and 2025, based on USPTO PatentsView data.
Which company holds the most patents in G09D?
International Business Machines Corporation leads G09D with 2 patents, making it the most active assignee in this technology area.
How is patent data for G09D collected?
Patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. It covers all US granted utility patents and assigns CPC codes based on the technology described in each patent.
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
A CPC class (e.g., G09) is a broad technology category. Subclasses like G09D provide finer granularity within that category. PlainPatent organizes data at the subclass level (4-character codes) for the most useful view of technology domains.

Learn More

Explore the patent dataset

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView — official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial