CPC technology class · F15
F15C - Fluid-circuit Elements Predominantly USED FOR Computing O…
Fluid-circuit elements predominantly used for computing or control purposes. 136 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year filing trajectory.
- 136
- US patents granted
- F15
- Parent CPC class
- 14
- Active assignees
- -18%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
Fluid-circuit Elements Predominantly USED FOR Computing O… ranks #615 of 670 CPC technology areas - 136 US patents granted since 2015, with filing down 18% over five years.
- #615
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 136
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- leading assignee (15)
- -18%
- filing velocity, last 5 yrs
CPC subclass F15C - FLUID-CIRCUIT ELEMENTS PREDOMINANTLY USED FOR COMPUTING OR CONTROL PURPOSES - covers 136 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records, within the broader CPC class F15 (FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS; HYDRAULICS OR PNEUMATICS IN GENERAL). See our CPC classification guide for how the system works.
The competitive landscape in F15C is shaped by 14 distinct companies actively filing in this space. Facebook Technologies, Llc leads with 15 patents, followed by Applied Biosystems, Llc at 8 grants and Cytonome/st, Llc at 5.
Filing activity in F15C is down 18% over the past five years versus 2015-2019, a relatively steady filing pace. All counts come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.
Is F15C innovation accelerating?
US utility-patent grants per year in F15C, 2015–2025 - recent five years are down 18% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads F15C?
The 12 most active assignees in FLUID-CIRCUIT ELEMENTS PREDOMINANTLY USED FOR COMPUTING OR CONTROL PURPOSES - wider bars mean more grants
- Vortex Pipe Systems
Vortex Pipe Systems LLC
10 patents
- Applied Biosystems
Applied Biosystems, LLC
8 patents
- Cytonome/St
CYTONOME/ST, LLC
5 patents
- Thru Tubing Solutions
THRU TUBING SOLUTIONS, INC.
4 patents
- Dlhbowles 3
DLHBOWLES, INC.
3 patents
- Rheonix 2
Rheonix, Inc.
2 patents
- Tactus Technology 1
Tactus Technology, Inc.
1 patents
- Leggett & Platt Canada 1
LEGGETT & PLATT CANADA CO.
1 patents
- Control Components 1
Control Components, Inc.
1 patents
- Stratec Se 1
STRATEC SE
1 patents
- Iridia 1
IRIDIA, INC.
1 patents
- Dolphin Fluidics S R L 1
DOLPHIN FLUIDICS S.R.L.
1 patents
What this shows Facebook is the most active filer in F15C, holding 15 of the 136 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in F15C |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Vortex Pipe Systems Llc | 10 |
| #2 | Applied Biosystems, Llc | 8 |
| #3 | Cytonome/st, Llc | 5 |
| #4 | THRU Tubing Solutions, Inc. | 4 |
| #5 | Dlhbowles, Inc. | 3 |
| #6 | Rheonix, Inc. | 2 |
| #7 | Tactus Technology, Inc. | 1 |
| #8 | Leggett & Platt Canada Co. | 1 |
| #9 | Control Components, Inc. | 1 |
| #10 | Stratec SE | 1 |
| #11 | Iridia, Inc. | 1 |
| #12 | Dolphin Fluidics S.r.l. | 1 |
| #13 | Jansen's Aircraft Systems Controls, Inc. | 1 |
| #14 | Silicon Biosystems S.p.a. | 1 |
About This Class
CPC subclass F15C belongs to class F15.
136 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.
14 companies actively patent in this space.
Classification System
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading F15C assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Top 14 F15C assignees by class footprint. Bubble size = patents in F15C. Source: USPTO PatentsView (claim depth is company-wide across all classes).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CPC class F15C?
How many patents have been filed in F15C?
Which company holds the most patents in F15C?
How is patent data for F15C collected?
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.