CPC technology class · D03
D03C - Shedding Mechanisms
Shedding mechanisms; pattern cards or chains; punching of cards; designing patterns. 85 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year filing trajectory.
- 85
- US patents granted
- D03
- Parent CPC class
- 12
- Active assignees
- -20%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
Shedding Mechanisms ranks #627 of 670 CPC technology areas - 85 US patents granted since 2015, with filing down 20% over five years.
- #627
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 85
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Staubli Faverges
- leading assignee (10)
- -20%
- filing velocity, last 5 yrs
CPC subclass D03C - SHEDDING MECHANISMS; PATTERN CARDS OR CHAINS; PUNCHING OF CARDS; DESIGNING PATTERNS - covers 85 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records, within the broader CPC class D03 (WEAVING). See our CPC classification guide for how the system works.
The competitive landscape in D03C is shaped by 12 distinct companies actively filing in this space. Staubli Faverges leads with 10 patents, followed by Nv Michel VAN DE Wiele at 8 grants and Staubli LYON at 7.
Filing activity in D03C is down 20% over the past five years versus 2015-2019, a notable slowdown that may signal a maturing field. All counts come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.
Is D03C innovation accelerating?
US utility-patent grants per year in D03C, 2015–2025 - recent five years are down 20% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads D03C?
The 12 most active assignees in SHEDDING MECHANISMS; PATTERN CARDS OR CHAINS; PUNCHING OF CARDS; DESIGNING PATTERNS - wider bars mean more grants
- Staubli Faverges
STAUBLI FAVERGES
10 patents
- Michel Van De Wiele
NV MICHEL VAN DE WIELE
8 patents
- Staubli Lyon
STAUBLI LYON
7 patents
- Staubli Bayreuth 3
STAUBLI BAYREUTH GMBH
3 patents
- Groz-beckert Kg 2
GROZ-BECKERT KG
2 patents
- Tsudakoma Kogyo 2
TSUDAKOMA KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
2 patents
- Albany Engineered Com… 2
Albany Engineered Composites, Inc.
2 patents
- Innotec Lightweight E… 2
INNOTEC LIGHTWEIGHT ENGINEERING & POLYMER TECHNOLOGY GMBH
2 patents
- Lindauer Dornier Gese… 2
Lindauer DORNIER Gesellschaft mbH
2 patents
- Vandewiele 1
Vandewiele NV
1 patents
- Textilma 1
Textilma AG
1 patents
- Wowwee Group 1
WOWWEE GROUP LTD.
1 patents
What this shows Staubli Faverges is the most active filer in D03C, holding 10 of the 85 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in D03C |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Staubli Faverges | 10 |
| #2 | Nv Michel VAN DE Wiele | 8 |
| #3 | Staubli LYON | 7 |
| #4 | Staubli Bayreuth Gmbh | 3 |
| #5 | Groz-beckert KG | 2 |
| #6 | Tsudakoma Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | 2 |
| #7 | Albany Engineered Composites, Inc. | 2 |
| #8 | Innotec Lightweight Engineering & Polymer Technology Gmbh | 2 |
| #9 | Lindauer Dornier Gesellschaft Mbh | 2 |
| #10 | Vandewiele Nv | 1 |
| #11 | Textilma Ag | 1 |
| #12 | Wowwee Group Ltd. | 1 |
About This Class
CPC subclass D03C belongs to class D03.
85 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.
12 companies actively patent in this space.
Classification System
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading D03C assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Top 12 D03C assignees by class footprint. Bubble size = patents in D03C. Source: USPTO PatentsView (claim depth is company-wide across all classes).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CPC class D03C?
How many patents have been filed in D03C?
Which company holds the most patents in D03C?
How is patent data for D03C collected?
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.