CPC technology class · C06
C06C - Detonating Or Priming Devices
Detonating or priming devices; fuses ; chemical lighters; pyrophoric compositions. 165 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year grant trajectory.
- 165
- US patents granted
- #2/3
- in C06
- 18.2%
- C06 class share
- -29%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Detonating Or Priming Devices ranks #611 of 670 CPC technology areas - 165 US patents granted since 2015, with recorded grant volume down 29% over five years.
- #611
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 165
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- The United States of…
- leading assignee (16)
- -29%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
How C06C's grant cadence moved
Between 2020–2024, C06C recorded 64 grants versus 90 in 2015–2019 (-29% equal-window velocity). Across complete years, output peaked in 2017 at 24 grants and bottomed in 2020 at 11 (+118% peak-over-trough). Lead assignee Matrix X, LLC holds 4.2% of the class ; the top three share 11.5%.
Leaderboard read
C06C concentration, lead at 4.2%
Matrix X, LLC leads this historical grant record at 4.2% of C06C - us corporation assignees hold 65% of class grants (51 of 78). Figures describe granted US utility patents in this CPC subclass, not current investment or legal strength.
- Leader's share
- 4.2%
- Top three share
- 11.5%
- Lead over #2
- 1
7 of 165 grants
of the class's recorded grants
more grants than Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, Inc.
Where C06C sits inside C06
Among 3 subclasses in C06 (EXPLOSIVES; Matches), C06C ranks #2 and holds 18.2% of the parent class's 908 recorded grants. Sibling chips below are the other subclasses in the same parent class, not the nationwide volume/lead-share peers further down.
Rising assignees active in C06C
Company-wide grant multiples (2022–2024 vs 2019–2021) among assignees with ≥5 patents in this subclass. Growth is company-wide; class patent counts are subclass-specific.
- #1 Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company 1.00x 8 → 8 company-wide · 6 in C06C
- #2 Ruag Ammotec GmbH 0.71x 14 → 10 company-wide · 5 in C06C
- #3 Spectre Materials Sciences, Inc. 0.33x 3 → 1 company-wide · 6 in C06C
- #4 Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, Inc. 0.02x 46 → 1 company-wide · 6 in C06C
C06C grants by year, peak 2017 (24)
US utility-patent grants per year in C06C, 2015–2025 - recent five years are down 29% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads C06C?
The 12 most active assignees in Detonating OR Priming DEVICES; Fuses ; Chemical LIGHTERS; Pyrophoric Compositions - wider bars mean more grants
- Matrix X
Matrix X, LLC
7 patents
- Northrop Grumman…
Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, Inc.
6 patents
- Ensign-bickford…
Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company
6 patents
- Spectre Materials…
Spectre Materials Sciences, Inc.
6 patents
- Ruag Ammotec
Ruag Ammotec GmbH
5 patents
- Dynaenergetics Europe
DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
4 patents
- Tk Holdings
TK Holdings, LLC
4 patents
- Armtec Defense…
Armtec Defense Products Co.
4 patents
- Detnet South Africa…
Detnet South Africa (PTY) Ltd
3 patents
- Owen Oil Tools
Owen Oil Tools LP
3 patents
- Fike
Fike Corporation
3 patents
- Terves 2
Terves, LLC
2 patents
What this shows The United States of… is the most active filer in C06C, holding 16 of the 165 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in C06C |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Matrix X, LLC | 7 |
| #2 | Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, Inc. | 6 |
| #3 | Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company | 6 |
| #4 | Spectre Materials Sciences, Inc. | 6 |
| #5 | Ruag Ammotec GmbH | 5 |
| #6 | DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH | 4 |
| #7 | TK Holdings, LLC | 4 |
| #8 | Armtec Defense Products Co. | 4 |
| #9 | Detnet South Africa (PTY) Ltd | 3 |
| #10 | Owen Oil Tools LP | 3 |
| #11 | Fike Corporation | 3 |
| #12 | Terves, LLC | 2 |
| #13 | Orica International Pte Ltd | 2 |
| #14 | Nexter Munitions | 2 |
| #15 | Dyno Nobel Inc. | 2 |
| #16 | Diehl BGT Defence GmbH & Co. KG | 2 |
| #17 | AEL Mining Services Limited | 2 |
| #18 | Viettel Group | 1 |
| #19 | University of Rhode Island Board of Trustees | 1 |
| #20 | DynaEnergetics GmbH & Co. KG | 1 |
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading C06C assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Questions about C06C
Which company holds the most patents in C06C?
Which C06C assignees grew fastest recently?
How does C06C compare inside parent class C06?
What to do with this data
C06C in context - here's where to go next.
- Matrix X, LLC leads C06C with 7 grants in this class. See full portfolio
- C06C ranks #611 of 670 by grant volume among all tracked CPC technology areas. See the ranking
- Inside parent class C06, the largest sibling subclass is C06B with 579 grants. Explore C06B
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through 2026-05-15; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Methodology - C06C figures are USPTO PatentsView granted-utility totals for this subclass (165 grants in the tracked window).
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.