CPC technology class · B02
B02B - Preparing Grain FOR Milling
Preparing grain for milling; refining granular fruit to commercial products by working the surface. 74 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year filing trajectory.
- 74
- US patents granted
- B02
- Parent CPC class
- 12
- Active assignees
- +52%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
Preparing Grain FOR Milling ranks #631 of 670 CPC technology areas - 74 US patents granted since 2015, with filing up 52% over five years.
- #631
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 74
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- General Mills
- leading assignee (8)
- +52%
- filing velocity, last 5 yrs
CPC subclass B02B - PREPARING GRAIN FOR MILLING; REFINING GRANULAR FRUIT TO COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS BY WORKING THE SURFACE - covers 74 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records, within the broader CPC class B02 (CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING). See our CPC classification guide for how the system works.
The competitive landscape in B02B is shaped by 12 distinct companies actively filing in this space. General Mills, Inc. leads with 8 patents, followed by Satake Corporation at 7 grants and Buhler (india) PVT. Ltd. at 3.
Filing activity in B02B is up 52% over the past five years versus 2015-2019, a sharp acceleration suggesting an emerging or fast-moving technology area. All counts come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.
Is B02B innovation accelerating?
US utility-patent grants per year in B02B, 2015–2025 - recent five years are up 52% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads B02B?
The 12 most active assignees in PREPARING GRAIN FOR MILLING; REFINING GRANULAR FRUIT TO COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS BY WORKING THE SURFACE - wider bars mean more grants
- General Mills
General Mills, Inc.
8 patents
- Satake
SATAKE CORPORATION
7 patents
- Buhler (India) Pvt 3
Buhler (India) PVT. LTD.
3 patents
- Gruma B De C V 2
GRUMA S.A.B. DE C.V.
2 patents
- Jose Borrell 2
Jose Borrell S.A.
2 patents
- Tate & Lyle Solutions… 1
TATE & LYLE SOLUTIONS USA LLC
1 patents
- Ardent Mills 1
Ardent Mills, LLC
1 patents
- Kompoferm 1
Kompoferm GmbH
1 patents
- Felters of South Caro… 1
Felters of South Carolina, LLC
1 patents
- Cotton Incorporated 1
Cotton Incorporated
1 patents
- Nara Machinery 1
Nara Machinery Co., Ltd.
1 patents
- Desmet Ballestra Engi… 1
N.V. Desmet Ballestra Engineering S.A.
1 patents
What this shows General Mills is the most active filer in B02B, holding 8 of the 74 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in B02B |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | General Mills, Inc. | 8 |
| #2 | Satake Corporation | 7 |
| #3 | Buhler (india) PVT. Ltd. | 3 |
| #4 | Gruma S.a.b. DE C.v. | 2 |
| #5 | Jose Borrell S.a. | 2 |
| #6 | TATE & LYLE Solutions USA Llc | 1 |
| #7 | Ardent Mills, Llc | 1 |
| #8 | Kompoferm Gmbh | 1 |
| #9 | Felters Of South Carolina, Llc | 1 |
| #10 | Cotton Incorporated | 1 |
| #11 | Nara Machinery Co., Ltd. | 1 |
| #12 | N.v. Desmet Ballestra Engineering S.a. | 1 |
About This Class
CPC subclass B02B belongs to class B02.
74 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.
12 companies actively patent in this space.
Classification System
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading B02B assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Top 12 B02B assignees by class footprint. Bubble size = patents in B02B. Source: USPTO PatentsView (claim depth is company-wide across all classes).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CPC class B02B?
How many patents have been filed in B02B?
Which company holds the most patents in B02B?
How is patent data for B02B collected?
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.