Overall rank by patents
#3,900
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 93 granted patents across 5 technology areas, active 2015–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: F04D (NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS).
The verdict
Youngo holds 93 US patents across 5 technology areas, rank #3,900 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Youngo Limited has been granted 93 US utility patents between 2015 and 2024, placing Youngo Limited at rank #3,900 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 5 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 1.1 claims per patent with primary concentration in F04D (NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS). As a Foreign Corporation, Youngo Limited is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Youngo sits between Sandoz Ag (93 patents, rank #3,896) and Anheuser-busch Inbev S.a. (92 patents, rank #3,904) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 26.1/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 17 grants, compared with 76 in the 2015–2019 window, a -78% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Youngo Limited's 1.1 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 5 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Youngo Limited against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Sandoz AG
93 patents
Shenyang Neusoft Medical Systems Co., Ltd.
93 patents
Sloan Kettering Institute for Cancer Research
93 patents
Sonion Nederland B.V.
93 patents
ZF ACTIVE SAFETY US INC.
93 patents
YOUNGO LIMITED
93 patents
ABB AG
92 patents
ALIPHCOM
92 patents
ANHEUSER-BUSCH INBEV S.A.
92 patents
What this shows Youngo holds 93 patents at rank #3,900, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #3,900 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Youngo's primary technology class.
Youngo's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 Top 81% higher than 19% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 19 | 20.4% |
| 2016 | 17 | 18.3% |
| 2017 | 24 | 25.8% |
| 2018 | 10 | 10.8% |
| 2019 | 6 | 6.5% |
| 2020 | 10 | 10.8% |
| 2021 | 2 | 2.2% |
| 2022 | 3 | 3.2% |
| 2024 | 2 | 2.2% |
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#3,900
Across all tracked assignees
26.1 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Youngo's 93 grants land it in the top 81% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.