Worgas Bruciatori S.R.L.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F23D (Burners).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Worgas ranks #44,113 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #44,113
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 9th percentile
- by Innovation Score (22.0/100)
- 13.7
- avg claims per patent
- +0%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R44113 · Foreign Corporation #44,113 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #44,113/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Wink Robotics
- CPC-NARROW F23D · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 22.0/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 13.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-FLAT +0% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Wink Robotics (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Worgas’s 22.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Worgas
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Worgas Bruciatori S… · this assignee 22
Worgas Bruciatori S… · this assignee
22 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Worgas's Innovation Score is 22.0/100 (9th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Worgas?
Each dot is one of Worgas’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Worgas’s own 13.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 9.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Worgas's grants concentrate
Worgas Bruciatori S.R.L. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under F23D (Burners). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Worgas sits between Wink Robotics and Wuhan Keda Marble Protective Materials Co., Ltd..
Who files at Worgas's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Wink Robotics
Wink Robotics
6 patents
- Wintec Korea
Wintec Korea Inc.
6 patents
- Wiserg
WISErg Corporation
6 patents
- Wontech
Wontech Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Worldmate
Worldmate, Ltd.
6 patents
- Wota
Wota Corp.
6 patents
- Wuhan Changsheng…
Wuhan Changsheng Mine Security Technology Limited
6 patents
- Wuhan Keda Marble…
Wuhan Keda Marble Protective Materials Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Worgas Bruciatori… ◀
Worgas Bruciatori S.R.L.
6 patents
What this shows Worgas holds 6 patents at rank #44,022, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Worgas
By rank, the assignees closest to #44,022 in granted patent volume.
- Wink Robotics #44,018 · 6 patents
- Wintec Korea Inc. #44,019 · 6 patents
- WISErg Corporation #44,020 · 6 patents
- Wontech Co., Ltd. #44,021 · 6 patents
- Worldmate, Ltd. #44,023 · 6 patents
- Wota Corp. #44,024 · 6 patents
- Wuhan Changsheng Mine Security Technology Limited #44,025 · 6 patents
- Wuhan Keda Marble Protective Materials Co., Ltd. #44,026 · 6 patents
Leaders in F23D (Burners)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Worgas's primary technology class.
- Delavan Inc. 62 in class
- Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc. 54 in class
- Clearsign Combustion Corporation 48 in class
- Rinnai Corporation 45 in class
- Pro-iroda Industries, Inc. 43 in class
- Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems, Ltd. 35 in class
- Lennox Industries Inc. 35 in class
- EBERSPÄCHER Climate Control Systems GMBH 29 in class
Worgas's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
22 9th percentile higher than 9% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2020 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2021 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Worgas Bruciatori S.R.L. patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Worgas Bruciatori S.R.L.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Worgas Bruciatori S.R.L.'s lead technology class is F23D (Burners), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F23D
- Ranked #44,113 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Worgas Bruciatori S.R.L. against Wink Robotics, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 22.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.