USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Winegard Company

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 18 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01Q (Antennas, i.e. Radio Aerials).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Winegard ranks #16,514 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 18 patents across 6 technology areas.

#16,514
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
21st percentile
by Innovation Score (26.8/100)
13.2
avg claims per patent
-71%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R16514 · US Corporation #16,514 · 18 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 18 grants
  • MID-PACK #16,514/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Wacker Chemical
  • CPC-NARROW H01Q · 6 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 26.8/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 13.2 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -71% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Wacker Chemical AG (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Winegard’s 26.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Winegard

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Winegard's Innovation Score is 26.8/100 (21st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Winegard?

Each dot is one of Winegard’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Winegard’s own 13.2 claims/patent is at or below the 15.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Winegard vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 17.917.91818.1 010203040 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Wacker Chemical AG - 18, 14.67Wacker ChemicalWave Neuroscience, Inc. - 18, 14.67Wave NeuroscienceWeir Slurry Group, Inc. - 18, 17.56Weir Slurry GroupWenzhou Mtlc Electric Appliances Co., Ltd - 18, 2.67Wenzhou Mtlc Elec…Woodside Energy Technologies Pty Ltd - 18, 29.33Woodside Energy P…World Wide Stationery Mfg. Co., Ltd. - 18, 15.72World Wide Statio…X-Spine Systems, Inc. - 18, 29.61X-spine SystemsXiamen Changelight Co., Ltd. - 18, 16.94Xiamen ChangelightWinegard Company - 18, 13.22Winegard
Winegard vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Winegard's grants concentrate

Winegard Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 77.8% of grants classified under H01Q (Antennas, i.e. Radio Aerials). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Winegard sits between Wacker Chemical AG and Xiamen Changelight Co., Ltd..

Who files at Winegard's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Winegard holds 18 patents at rank #16,514, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Winegard

By rank, the assignees closest to #16,514 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H01Q (Antennas)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Winegard's primary technology class.

Winegard's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

27 21st percentile higher than 21% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

012345 2015201620172018201920202021 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Winegard Company patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 4 22.2%
2016 3 16.7%
2017 2 11.1%
2018 2 11.1%
2019 3 16.7%
2020 3 16.7%
2021 1 5.6%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Winegard Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Winegard Company's lead technology class is H01Q (Antennas, i.e. Radio Aerials), 77.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01Q
  • Ranked #16,514 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Winegard Company against Wacker Chemical AG, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 26.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.