Where does Wine Plum, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Wine Plum, Inc. ranks #33,902 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Wine Plum, Inc. hold?

Wine Plum, Inc. holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2021, spanning 9 technology areas.

What is Wine Plum, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Wine Plum, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 27.3 out of 100 (23rd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Wine Plum, Inc. focus on?

Wine Plum, Inc.'s top technology area is B67D (Dispensing, Delivering OR Transferring Liquids, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR) with 6 patents, ranking #93 of 469 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 9 CPC subclasses total.

Is Wine Plum, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Wine Plum, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -40% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Wine Plum, Inc.'s patents?

Wine Plum, Inc.'s patents average 15.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Wine Plum, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Wine Plum, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B67D (Dispensing, Delivering OR Transferring Liquids, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Wine ranks #33,902 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 9 technology areas.

#33,902
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 23rd percentile
by Innovation Score (27.3/100): 15.1
avg claims per patent: -40%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R33902 · US Corporation #33,902 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #33,902/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Wildfire Systems
CPC-NARROW B67D · 9 areas
INNOV-THIN 27.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 15.1 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -40% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Wildfire Systems, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Wine’s 27.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (28%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 10.6 pts (39%) Claim depth 9.1 pts (33%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Wine Plum · this assignee

27
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Wine's Innovation Score is 27.3/100 (23rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Wine?

Each dot is one of Wine’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Wine’s own 15.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 7.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Wine vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Wine's grants concentrate

Wine Plum, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 75% of grants classified under B67D (Dispensing, Delivering OR Transferring Liquids, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (3 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2019. By volume, Wine sits between Wildfire Systems, Inc. and Wolf & Associates, Inc..

Wildfire Systems

8
Wilkinson Ecologi…

8
William Tools

8
Wine Master Cella…

8
Wing TAK LEE Sili…

8
Winn Incorporated

8
Wiph

8
Wolf & Associates

8
Wine Plum ◀

8

What this shows Wine holds 8 patents at rank #33,860, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Wine

By rank, the assignees closest to #33,860 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B67D (Dispensing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Wine's primary technology class.

Wine's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

27 23rd percentile higher than 23% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Wine Plum, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	3	37.5%
2019	2	25.0%
2021	3	37.5%

Which technologies does Wine Plum, Inc. patent most?

B67D - Dispensing, Delivering OR Transferring Liquids, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 6

B01F - Mixing, e.g. Dissolving, Emulsifying OR Dispersing 5

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 2

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 2

C12H - Pasteurisation, Sterilisation, Preservation, Purification, Clarification OR Ageing OF Alcoholic BEVERAGES; Methods FOR Altering THE Alcohol Content OF Fermented Solutions OR Alcoholic Beverages 2

A47J - Kitchen EQUIPMENT; Coffee MILLS; Spice MILLS; Apparatus FOR Making Beverages 2

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 2

G06K - Graphical Data Reading ; Presentation OF DATA; Record CARRIERS; Handling Record Carriers 2

B67B - Applying Closure Members TO Bottles Jars, OR Similar CONTAINERS; Opening Closed Containers 2

Top 9 of 9 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Wine Plum, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Wine Plum, Inc.'s lead technology class is B67D (Dispensing, Delivering OR Transferring Liquids, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 75% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B67D
Ranked #33,902 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Wine Plum, Inc. against Wildfire Systems, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 27.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.