Where does Whoop, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Whoop, Inc. ranks #10,508 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Whoop, Inc. hold?

Whoop, Inc. holds 30 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2025, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is Whoop, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Whoop, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 38.1 out of 100 (top 41% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Whoop, Inc. focus on?

Whoop, Inc.'s top technology area is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification) with 22 patents, ranking #818 of 7,127 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

Is Whoop, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Whoop, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +89% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Whoop, Inc.'s patents?

Whoop, Inc.'s patents average 15.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Whoop, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Whoop, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 30 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Whoop ranks #10,508 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 30 patents across 5 technology areas.

#10,508
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 41%
by Innovation Score (38.1/100): 15.4
avg claims per patent: +89%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R10508 · US Corporation #10,508 · 30 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 30 grants
UPPER-Q #10,508/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Wagic
CPC-NARROW A61B · 5 areas
INNOV-THIN 38.1/100
CLAIMS-RICH 15.4 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +89% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Wagic, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Whoop’s 38.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.9 pts (31%) Velocity 9.2 pts (24%) Breadth 7.9 pts (21%) Claim depth 9.2 pts (24%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
3-D Matrix · near

38
Ultrata · near

38
Panoramic Power · near

38
Vector Launch · near

38
Whoop · this assignee

38
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Whoop's Innovation Score is 38.1/100 (top 41% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Whoop?

Each dot is one of Whoop’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Whoop’s own 15.4 claims/patent is at or below the 15.5 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Whoop vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Whoop's grants concentrate

Whoop, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 73.3% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Whoop sits between Wilson Tool International Inc. and ZeniMax Media Inc..

Whoop's three-year grant acceleration

Whoop, Inc. shows 11 grants in 2022–2024 against only 8 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Wilson Tool Inter…

30
Wagic

30
Wayfair

30
Welspun India

30
Würth Internation…

30
YPF TecnologÍA

30
Zeus

30
Zenimax Media

30
Whoop ◀

30

What this shows Whoop holds 30 patents at rank #10,509, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Whoop

By rank, the assignees closest to #10,509 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Whoop's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Whoop, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A61B (Diagnosis), Whoop ranks #818 of 7,127 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (38 here).

Vector Launch Inc. 38 Panoramic Power Ltd. 38 Ultrata, LLC 38 3-D Matrix, Ltd. 38

Whoop's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

38 Top 41% higher than 59% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Whoop, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	3.3%
2017	6	20.0%
2019	2	6.7%
2020	3	10.0%
2021	3	10.0%
2022	2	6.7%
2023	5	16.7%
2024	4	13.3%
2025partial year	4	13.3%

Which technologies does Whoop, Inc. patent most?

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 22

G16H - Healthcare Informatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR THE Handling OR Processing OF Medical OR Healthcare Data 18

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 13

A63B - Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment 11

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 2

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Whoop, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Whoop, Inc.'s lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 73.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
Ranked #10,508 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Whoop, Inc. against Wilson Tool International Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 38.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.