Overall rank by patents
#44,072
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 2 technology areas, active 2023–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B60P (VEHICLES ADAPTED FOR LOAD TRANSPORTATION OR TO TRANSPORT, TO CARRY, OR TO COMPRISE SPECIAL LOADS OR OBJECTS).
The verdict
White holds 6 US patents across 2 technology areas, rank #44,072 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
White Mule Company has been granted 6 US utility patents between 2023 and 2025, placing White Mule Company at rank #44,072 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 2 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 4.2 claims per patent with primary concentration in B60P (VEHICLES ADAPTED FOR LOAD TRANSPORTATION OR TO TRANSPORT, TO CARRY, OR TO COMPRISE SPECIAL LOADS OR OBJECTS). As a US Corporation, White Mule Company is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, White sits between Westlake Vinyl Corporation (6 patents, rank #44,068) and Whiteley Corporation Pty Ltd (6 patents, rank #44,076) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 34.2/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2023 through 2025, with 6 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. White Mule Company's 4.2 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while specialization in 2 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark White Mule Company against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Westlake Vinyl Corporation
6 patents
Westmor Industries, LLC
6 patents
Westwood Capital Partners, Inc.
6 patents
Wheely-Safe Ltd.
6 patents
White's Equipment Rental, LLC
6 patents
WhitePages, Inc.
6 patents
Whitefield Plastics Corporation
6 patents
Whiteley Corporation Pty Ltd
6 patents
White Mule Company
6 patents
What this shows White holds 6 patents at rank #44,072, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #44,072 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in White's primary technology class.
White's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
34 Top 53% higher than 47% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2023–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2024 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2025 | 2 | 33.3% |
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#44,072
Across all tracked assignees
34.2 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
White's 6 grants land it in the top 53% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.