Where does Webtext Holdings Limited rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Webtext Holdings Limited ranks #27,814 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Webtext Holdings Limited hold?

Webtext Holdings Limited holds 10 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2023, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is Webtext Holdings Limited's Innovation Score?

Webtext Holdings Limited has an Innovation Score of 33.9 out of 100 (46th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Webtext Holdings Limited focus on?

Webtext Holdings Limited's top technology area is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication) with 8 patents, ranking #2,806 of 8,956 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

Is Webtext Holdings Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Webtext Holdings Limited's recent grant velocity is -33% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Webtext Holdings Limited's patents?

Webtext Holdings Limited's patents average 35.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Webtext Holdings Limited patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Webtext Holdings Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Webtext ranks #27,814 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 5 technology areas.

#27,814
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 46th percentile
by Innovation Score (33.9/100): 35.7
avg claims per patent: -33%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R27814 · Foreign Corporation #27,814 · 10 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
MID-PACK #27,814/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Wamgroup S P A
CPC-NARROW H04L · 5 areas
INNOV-THIN 33.9/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 35.7 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DOWN -33% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Wamgroup S.P.A. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Webtext’s 33.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.3 pts (24%) Velocity 2.7 pts (8%) Breadth 7.9 pts (23%) Claim depth 15.0 pts (44%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Webtext Holdings · this assignee

34
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Webtext's Innovation Score is 33.9/100 (46th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Webtext?

Each dot is one of Webtext’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Webtext’s own 35.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Webtext vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Webtext's grants concentrate

Webtext Holdings Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Webtext sits between Wamgroup S.P.A. and Wexenergy LLC.

Webtext's three-year grant acceleration

Webtext Holdings Limited shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Wamgroup S P A

10
Wattrii

10
WEB Spark

10
Weber Orthopedic

10
Western Michigan…

10
Western Sydney Lo…

10
Westrock Slatersv…

10
Wexenergy

10
Webtext Holdings ◀

10

What this shows Webtext holds 10 patents at rank #27,800, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Webtext

By rank, the assignees closest to #27,800 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Webtext's primary technology class.

Webtext's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 46th percentile higher than 46% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Webtext Holdings Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	1	10.0%
2018	2	20.0%
2019	3	30.0%
2020	1	10.0%
2021	1	10.0%
2022	1	10.0%
2023	1	10.0%

Which technologies does Webtext Holdings Limited patent most?

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 8

H04M - Telephonic Communication 4

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 3

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 2

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 2

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Webtext Holdings Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Webtext Holdings Limited's lead technology class is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04L
Ranked #27,814 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Webtext Holdings Limited against Wamgroup S.P.A., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 33.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.