WDI (Xiamen) Technology Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E03D (Water-closets OR Urinals With Flushing DEVICES; Flushing Valves Therefor).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, WDI ranks #44,043 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #44,043
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 9th percentile
- by Innovation Score (21.8/100)
- 13.3
- avg claims per patent
- -80%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R44043 · Foreign Corporation #44,043 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #44,043/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Waukesha Electric…
- CPC-NARROW E03D · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 21.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 13.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -80% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Waukesha Electric Systems, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How WDI’s 21.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around WDI
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- WDI (Xiamen)… · this assignee 22
WDI (Xiamen)… · this assignee
22 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows WDI's Innovation Score is 21.8/100 (9th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for WDI?
Each dot is one of WDI’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). WDI’s own 13.3 claims/patent is at or below the 21.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where WDI's grants concentrate
WDI (Xiamen) Technology Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under E03D (Water-closets OR Urinals With Flushing DEVICES; Flushing Valves Therefor). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, WDI sits between Waukesha Electric Systems, Inc. and Webo Werkzeugbau Oberschwaben GMBH.
Who files at WDI's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Waukesha Electric…
Waukesha Electric Systems, Inc.
6 patents
- Wave Power Techno…
Wave Power Technology Inc.
6 patents
- Wavetronix
Wavetronix LLC
6 patents
- Wcco Belting
Wcco Belting, Inc.
6 patents
- Weatherford Canada
Weatherford Canada Ltd.
6 patents
- Weatherford Switz…
Weatherford Switzerland Trading AND Development GMBH
6 patents
- Weaver Leather
Weaver Leather, LLC
6 patents
- Webo Werkzeugbau…
Webo Werkzeugbau Oberschwaben GMBH
6 patents
- WDI (Xiamen) Tech… ◀
WDI (Xiamen) Technology Inc.
6 patents
What this shows WDI holds 6 patents at rank #43,998, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near WDI
By rank, the assignees closest to #43,998 in granted patent volume.
- Waukesha Electric Systems, Inc. #43,994 · 6 patents
- Wave Power Technology Inc. #43,995 · 6 patents
- Wavetronix LLC #43,996 · 6 patents
- Wcco Belting, Inc. #43,997 · 6 patents
- Weatherford Canada Ltd. #43,999 · 6 patents
- Weatherford Switzerland Trading AND Development GMBH #44,000 · 6 patents
- Weaver Leather, LLC #44,001 · 6 patents
- Webo Werkzeugbau Oberschwaben GMBH #44,002 · 6 patents
Leaders in E03D (Water-closets OR Urinals With Flushing Devices)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in WDI's primary technology class.
WDI's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
22 9th percentile higher than 9% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does WDI (Xiamen) Technology Inc. patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
WDI (Xiamen) Technology Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- WDI (Xiamen) Technology Inc.'s lead technology class is E03D (Water-closets OR Urinals With Flushing DEVICES; Flushing Valves Therefor), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E03D
- Ranked #44,043 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare WDI (Xiamen) Technology Inc. against Waukesha Electric Systems, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 21.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.