Where does Wagner Spray Tech Corporation rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Wagner Spray Tech Corporation ranks #5,808 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Wagner Spray Tech Corporation hold?

Wagner Spray Tech Corporation holds 59 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 32 technology areas.

What is Wagner Spray Tech Corporation's Innovation Score?

Wagner Spray Tech Corporation has an Innovation Score of 50.3 out of 100 (top 13% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Wagner Spray Tech Corporation focus on?

Wagner Spray Tech Corporation's top technology area is B05B (Spraying APPARATUS; Atomising APPARATUS; Nozzles) with 34 patents, ranking #36 of 1,384 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 32 CPC subclasses total.

Is Wagner Spray Tech Corporation's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Wagner Spray Tech Corporation's recent grant velocity is -4% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Wagner Spray Tech Corporation's patents?

Wagner Spray Tech Corporation's patents average 12.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Wagner Spray Tech Corporation patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Wagner Spray Tech Corporation

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 59 granted patents across 32 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B05B (Spraying APPARATUS; Atomising APPARATUS; Nozzles).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Wagner ranks #5,808 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 59 patents across 32 technology areas.

#5,808
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 13%
by Innovation Score (50.3/100): 12.5
avg claims per patent: -4%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R5808 · US Corporation #5,808 · 59 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 59 grants
UPPER-Q #5,808/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH rewardStyle
CPC-FOCUS B05B · 32 areas
INNOV-PAR 50.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 12.5 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-FLAT -4% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: rewardStyle, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Wagner’s 50.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 14.1 pts (28%) Velocity 8.7 pts (17%) Breadth 20.0 pts (40%) Claim depth 7.5 pts (15%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Medartis · near

50
Nasdaq · near

50
National University… · near

50
National University… · near

50
Wagner Spray Tech · this assignee

50
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Wagner's Innovation Score is 50.3/100 (top 13% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Wagner?

Each dot is one of Wagner’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Wagner’s own 12.5 claims/patent is at or below the 16.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Wagner vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Wagner's grants concentrate

Wagner Spray Tech Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 32 CPC subclasses with 57.6% of grants classified under B05B (Spraying APPARATUS; Atomising APPARATUS; Nozzles). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (10 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2023. By volume, Wagner sits between Vodafone GMBH and AAC Optics (Changzhou) Co., Ltd..

Wagner's three-year grant acceleration

Wagner Spray Tech Corporation shows 17 grants in 2022–2024 against only 13 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Vodafone

59
Ventana Micro Sys…

59
Wanhua Chemical G…

59
Whitewater West I…

59
Wisys Technology…

59
rewardstyle

59
ubiome

59
Wagner Spray Tech ◀

59
AAC Optics (Chang…

58

What this shows Wagner holds 59 patents at rank #5,808, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Wagner

By rank, the assignees closest to #5,808 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B05B (Spraying Apparatus)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Wagner's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Wagner, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In B05B (Spraying Apparatus), Wagner ranks #36 of 1,384 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (50 here).

National University Corporation University of Toyama 50 National University Corporation Gunma University 50 Medartis AG 50 Nasdaq, Inc. 50

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (12.5 here).

F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG 12.5 avg Klein Tools, Inc. 12.5 avg Magneti Marelli S.p.A. 12.5 avg Syracuse University 12.5 avg

Wagner's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

50 Top 13% higher than 87% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Wagner Spray Tech Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	8	13.6%
2016	3	5.1%
2017	9	15.3%
2018	5	8.5%
2019	3	5.1%
2020	4	6.8%
2021	6	10.2%
2022	5	8.5%
2023	2	3.4%
2024	10	16.9%
2025partial year	4	6.8%

Which technologies does Wagner Spray Tech Corporation patent most?

B05B - Spraying APPARATUS; Atomising APPARATUS; Nozzles 34

F04B - Positive-displacement Machines FOR LIQUIDS; Pumps 7

B05C - Apparatus FOR Applying Fluent Materials TO Surfaces, IN General 5

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 4

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 4

B01F - Mixing, e.g. Dissolving, Emulsifying OR Dispersing 4

F16L - PIPES; Joints OR Fittings FOR PIPES; Supports FOR Pipes, Cables OR Protective TUBING; Means FOR Thermal Insulation IN General 3

B08B - Cleaning IN GENERAL; Prevention OF Fouling IN General 2

F16K - VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating 2

B29B - Preparation OR Pretreatment OF THE Material TO BE SHAPED; Making Granules OR PREFORMS; Recovery OF Plastics OR Other Constituents OF Waste Material Containing Plastics 2

F16H - Gearing 2

B44D - Painting OR Artistic Drawing, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Preserving PAINTINGS; Surface Treatment TO Obtain Special Artistic Surface Effects OR Finishes 1

B65D - Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR Fittings THEREFOR; Packaging ELEMENTS; Packages 1

B23K - Soldering OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; Cladding OR Plating BY Soldering OR WELDING; Cutting BY Applying Heat Locally, e.g. Flame CUTTING; Working BY Laser Beam 1

B21K - Making Forged OR Pressed Metal Products, e.g. Horse-shoes, Rivets, Bolts OR Wheels 1

Top 15 of 32 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Wagner Spray Tech Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Wagner Spray Tech Corporation's lead technology class is B05B (Spraying APPARATUS; Atomising APPARATUS; Nozzles), 57.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B05B
Ranked #5,808 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Wagner Spray Tech Corporation against Vodafone GMBH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 50.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.