Overall rank by patents
#43,980
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 10 technology areas, active 2021–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: H01M (PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY).
The verdict
W-scope holds 6 US patents across 10 technology areas, rank #43,980 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
W-scope Chungju Plant Co., Ltd. has been granted 6 US utility patents between 2021 and 2025, placing W-scope Chungju Plant Co., Ltd. at rank #43,980 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 10 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 11.2 claims per patent with primary concentration in H01M (PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY). As a Foreign Corporation, W-scope Chungju Plant Co., Ltd. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, W-scope sits between Vortex Intellectual Property Holding Llc (6 patents, rank #43,976) and Wafer MEMS Co., Ltd. (6 patents, rank #43,984) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 44.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2021 through 2025, with 6 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. W-scope Chungju Plant Co., Ltd.'s 11.2 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 10 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark W-scope Chungju Plant Co., Ltd. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Vortex Intellectual Property Holding LLC
6 patents
Vorticity Inc.
6 patents
Vu Systems, LLC
6 patents
Vyne Therapeutics Inc.
6 patents
W-SCOPE KOREA CO., LTD.
6 patents
WABCO India Limited
6 patents
WABCO RADBREMSEN GMBH
6 patents
WAFER MEMS CO., LTD.
6 patents
W-SCOPE CHUNGJU PLANT CO., LTD.
6 patents
What this shows W-scope holds 6 patents at rank #43,980, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #43,980 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in W-scope's primary technology class.
W-scope's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
45 Top 25% higher than 75% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2022 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2023 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2024 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2025 | 1 | 16.7% |
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#43,980
Across all tracked assignees
44.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
W-scope's 6 grants land it in the top 25% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.