Visual Effect Innovations, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Visual ranks #43,965 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #43,965
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 12th percentile
- by Innovation Score (23.3/100)
- 17.3
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R43965 · US Corporation #43,965 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #43,965/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Virgin America
- CPC-NARROW G02B · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 23.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Virgin America (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Visual’s 23.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Visual
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Visual Effect… · this assignee 23
Visual Effect… · this assignee
23 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Visual's Innovation Score is 23.3/100 (12th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Visual?
Each dot is one of Visual’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Visual’s own 17.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Visual's grants concentrate
Visual Effect Innovations, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus). By volume, Visual sits between Virgin America and Vitalmex Internacional S.A. DE C.V..
Who files at Visual's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Virgin America
Virgin America
6 patents
- Virtualwindow
Virtualwindow Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Vishay Advanced
Vishay Advanced Technologies, Ltd.
6 patents
- Vision Diagnostics
Vision Diagnostics, Inc.
6 patents
- VIT
VIT
6 patents
- Vital Alert Commu…
Vital Alert Communication Inc.
6 patents
- Vital Signs
Vital Signs, Inc.
6 patents
- Vitalmex Internac…
Vitalmex Internacional S.A. DE C.V.
6 patents
- Visual Effect Inn… ◀
Visual Effect Innovations, LLC
6 patents
What this shows Visual holds 6 patents at rank #43,891, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Visual
By rank, the assignees closest to #43,891 in granted patent volume.
- Virgin America #43,887 · 6 patents
- Virtualwindow Co., Ltd. #43,888 · 6 patents
- Vishay Advanced Technologies, Ltd. #43,889 · 6 patents
- Vision Diagnostics, Inc. #43,890 · 6 patents
- VIT #43,892 · 6 patents
- Vital Alert Communication Inc. #43,893 · 6 patents
- Vital Signs, Inc. #43,894 · 6 patents
- Vitalmex Internacional S.A. DE C.V. #43,895 · 6 patents
Leaders in G02B (Optical Elements)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Visual's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4,608 in class
- Canon Kabushiki Kaisha 2,525 in class
- Fujifilm Corporation 2,173 in class
- BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. 1,899 in class
- Olympus Corporation 1,893 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 1,572 in class
- Apple Inc. 1,367 in class
- Seiko Epson Corporation 1,332 in class
Visual's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 12th percentile higher than 12% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2018 | 3 | 50.0% |
Which technologies does Visual Effect Innovations, LLC patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Visual Effect Innovations, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Visual Effect Innovations, LLC's lead technology class is G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G02B
- Ranked #43,965 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Visual Effect Innovations, LLC against Virgin America, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 23.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.