Vidacare LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 18 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Vidacare ranks #16,494 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 18 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #16,494
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 25th percentile
- by Innovation Score (27.8/100)
- 13.8
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R16494 · US Corporation #16,494 · 18 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 18 grants
- MID-PACK #16,494/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Vatbox
- CPC-NARROW A61B · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 27.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 13.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Vatbox, Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Vidacare’s 27.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Vidacare
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Vidacare · this assignee 28
Vidacare · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Vidacare's Innovation Score is 27.8/100 (25th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Vidacare?
Each dot is one of Vidacare’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Vidacare’s own 13.8 claims/patent is at or below the 14.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Vidacare's grants concentrate
Vidacare LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (10 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2017. By volume, Vidacare sits between Vr-edu, Inc. and W.C. BRADLEY/ZEBCO Holdings, Inc..
Who files at Vidacare's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Vr-edu
Vr-edu, Inc.
18 patents
- Vatbox
Vatbox, Ltd.
18 patents
- Vedabio
VedaBio, Inc.
18 patents
- Vialase
ViaLase, Inc.
18 patents
- Viking Range
Viking Range, LLC
18 patents
- Virco Mfg
Virco Mfg. Corporation
18 patents
- Vlaamse Instellin…
Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek NV (VITO)
18 patents
- W C Bradley/Zebco…
W.C. BRADLEY/ZEBCO Holdings, Inc.
18 patents
- Vidacare ◀
Vidacare LLC
18 patents
What this shows Vidacare holds 18 patents at rank #16,498, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Vidacare
By rank, the assignees closest to #16,498 in granted patent volume.
- Vr-edu, Inc. #16,494 · 18 patents
- Vatbox, Ltd. #16,495 · 18 patents
- VedaBio, Inc. #16,496 · 18 patents
- ViaLase, Inc. #16,497 · 18 patents
- Viking Range, LLC #16,499 · 18 patents
- Virco Mfg. Corporation #16,500 · 18 patents
- Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek NV (VITO) #16,501 · 18 patents
- W.C. BRADLEY/ZEBCO Holdings, Inc. #16,502 · 18 patents
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Vidacare's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
Vidacare's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 25th percentile higher than 25% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 2016 | 10 | 55.6% |
| 2017 | 2 | 11.1% |
Which technologies does Vidacare LLC patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Vidacare LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Vidacare LLC's lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #16,494 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Vidacare LLC against Vr-edu, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 27.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.