PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Victorialand Beauty, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Victorialand ranks #38,210 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 0 technology areas.

#38,210
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
25th percentile
by Innovation Score (27.8/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R38210 · US Corporation #38,210 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
  • LOWER-Q #38,210/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Verve Medical
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-THIN 27.8/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • SPAN-YRS 2022–2023 · 2y
  • BOOK-RICH 8/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Verve Medical, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Victorialand’s 27.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Victorialand

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Victorialand's Innovation Score is 27.8/100 (25th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Victorialand?

Each dot is one of Victorialand’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Victorialand’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 19.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Victorialand vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 6.97.07.077.07.07.1 010203040 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Verve Medical, Inc. - 7, 9.57Verve MedicalVerve Wireless, Inc. - 7, 18.71Verve WirelessVia Surgical Ltd - 7, 14Via SurgicalVibratory Solutions, LLC - 7, 22Vibratory Solutio…Vidac Pharma Ltd.. - 7, 34.57Vidac PharmaVideokawa, Inc. - 7, 28.29VideokawaVietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City - 7, 19.57Vietnam National…Viking Genetics Fmba - 7, 21Viking Genetics F…Victorialand Beauty, LLC - 7, 1Victorialand Beau…
Victorialand vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Victorialand's grants concentrate

Victorialand Beauty, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2022 (4 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2023. By volume, Victorialand sits between Verve Medical, Inc. and Viking Genetics Fmba.

Victorialand's three-year grant acceleration

Victorialand Beauty, LLC shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Victorialand's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Victorialand holds 7 patents at rank #38,207, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Victorialand

By rank, the assignees closest to #38,207 in granted patent volume.

Victorialand's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

28 25th percentile higher than 25% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

2.533.544.5 20222023 3
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2022–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Victorialand Beauty, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2022 4 57.1%
2023 3 42.9%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Victorialand Beauty, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #38,210 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Victorialand Beauty, LLC against Verve Medical, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 27.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.