VascoMed GmbH
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Vascomed ranks #21,993 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #21,993
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 25th percentile
- by Innovation Score (27.8/100)
- 14.4
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R21993 · Foreign Corporation #21,993 · 13 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
- MID-PACK #21,993/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Vaisala
- CPC-NARROW A61B · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 27.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Vaisala, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Vascomed’s 27.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Vascomed
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- VascoMed · this assignee 28
VascoMed · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Vascomed's Innovation Score is 27.8/100 (25th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Vascomed?
Each dot is one of Vascomed’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Vascomed’s own 14.4 claims/patent is at or below the 16.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Vascomed's grants concentrate
VascoMed GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 84.6% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Vascomed sits between Vaisala, Inc. and Vigilytics LLC.
Who files at VascoMed's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Vaisala
Vaisala, Inc.
13 patents
- Valeo eautomotive…
Valeo eAutomotive Germany GmbH
13 patents
- Valneva SE
Valneva SE
13 patents
- Vaporstream
Vaporstream, Inc.
13 patents
- Veea Systems
Veea Systems Limited
13 patents
- Vertical Tank
Vertical Tank, Inc.
13 patents
- Viavi Solutions F…
Viavi Solutions France SAS
13 patents
- Vigilytics
Vigilytics LLC
13 patents
- Vascomed ◀
VascoMed GmbH
13 patents
What this shows VascoMed holds 13 patents at rank #22,001, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near VascoMed
By rank, the assignees closest to #22,001 in granted patent volume.
- Vaisala, Inc. #21,997 · 13 patents
- Valeo eAutomotive Germany GmbH #21,998 · 13 patents
- Valneva SE #21,999 · 13 patents
- Vaporstream, Inc. #22,000 · 13 patents
- Veea Systems Limited #22,002 · 13 patents
- Vertical Tank, Inc. #22,003 · 13 patents
- Viavi Solutions France SAS #22,004 · 13 patents
- Vigilytics LLC #22,005 · 13 patents
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in VascoMed's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
Vascomed's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 25th percentile higher than 25% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 23.1% |
| 2016 | 2 | 15.4% |
| 2017 | 4 | 30.8% |
| 2018 | 3 | 23.1% |
| 2019 | 1 | 7.7% |
Which technologies does VascoMed GmbH patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
VascoMed GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- VascoMed GmbH's lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 84.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #21,993 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare VascoMed GmbH against Vaisala, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 27.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.