URC Ventures, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, URC ranks #43,865 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #43,865
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 45th percentile
- by Innovation Score (33.7/100)
- 30.5
- avg claims per patent
- -80%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R43865 · US Corporation #43,865 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #43,865/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH UPL Europe
- CPC-NARROW G06T · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 33.7/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 30.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -80% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: UPL Europe Ltd (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How URC’s 33.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around URC
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- URC Ventures · this assignee 34
URC Ventures · this assignee
34 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows URC's Innovation Score is 33.7/100 (45th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for URC?
Each dot is one of URC’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). URC’s own 30.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 9.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where URC's grants concentrate
URC Ventures, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, URC sits between UPL Europe Ltd and Usenlight Corporation.
URC's three-year grant acceleration
URC Ventures, Inc. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at URC's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- UPL Europe
UPL Europe Ltd
6 patents
- Uppthera
Uppthera
6 patents
- Urakami
Urakami LLC
6 patents
- Urban SKY
Urban SKY
6 patents
- Ureka Sarl
Ureka Sarl
6 patents
- US Spine
US Spine, Inc.
6 patents
- USA Intellectual…
USA Intellectual Property Holding, Inc.
6 patents
- Usenlight
Usenlight Corporation
6 patents
- URC Ventures ◀
URC Ventures, Inc.
6 patents
What this shows URC holds 6 patents at rank #43,805, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near URC
By rank, the assignees closest to #43,805 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in URC's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4,120 in class
- Canon Kabushiki Kaisha 3,282 in class
- Apple Inc. 2,522 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 2,484 in class
- Intel Corporation 2,439 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 2,389 in class
- International Business Machines Corporation 2,281 in class
- Google LLC 2,182 in class
URC's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
34 45th percentile higher than 45% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2016 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2019 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2022 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does URC Ventures, Inc. patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
URC Ventures, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- URC Ventures, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06T
- Ranked #43,865 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare URC Ventures, Inc. against UPL Europe Ltd, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 33.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.