Two Trees Photonics Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G03H (Holographic Processes OR Apparatus).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Two ranks #33,698 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #33,698
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 16th percentile
- by Innovation Score (24.9/100)
- 17.0
- avg claims per patent
- -67%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R33698 · Foreign Corporation #33,698 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #33,698/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Tubular Labs
- CPC-NARROW G03H · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 24.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -67% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Tubular Labs, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Two’s 24.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Two
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Two Trees Photonics · this assignee 25
Two Trees Photonics · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Two's Innovation Score is 24.9/100 (16th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Two?
Each dot is one of Two’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Two’s own 17.0 claims/patent is at or below the 17.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Two's grants concentrate
Two Trees Photonics Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G03H (Holographic Processes OR Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Two sits between Tubular Labs, Inc. and Tyrolit—Schleifmittelwerke Swarovski AG & Co K.G..
Who files at Two's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Tubular Labs
Tubular Labs, Inc.
8 patents
- Tulavi Therapeuti…
Tulavi Therapeutics, Inc.
8 patents
- Tulsa Winch
Tulsa Winch, Inc.
8 patents
- Twin Health
Twin Health, Inc.
8 patents
- Tyco (Dongguan)
Tyco Electronics (Dongguan) Ltd.
8 patents
- Tyger Manufacturi…
Tyger Manufacturing LLC
8 patents
- Tyri International
Tyri International, Inc.
8 patents
- Tyrolit—Schleifmi…
Tyrolit—Schleifmittelwerke Swarovski AG & Co K.G.
8 patents
- Two Trees Photoni… ◀
Two Trees Photonics Limited
8 patents
What this shows Two holds 8 patents at rank #33,682, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Two
By rank, the assignees closest to #33,682 in granted patent volume.
- Tubular Labs, Inc. #33,678 · 8 patents
- Tulavi Therapeutics, Inc. #33,679 · 8 patents
- Tulsa Winch, Inc. #33,680 · 8 patents
- Twin Health, Inc. #33,681 · 8 patents
- Tyco Electronics (Dongguan) Ltd. #33,683 · 8 patents
- Tyger Manufacturing LLC #33,684 · 8 patents
- Tyri International, Inc. #33,685 · 8 patents
- Tyrolit—Schleifmittelwerke Swarovski AG & Co K.G. #33,686 · 8 patents
Leaders in G03H (Holographic Processes OR Apparatus)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Two's primary technology class.
Two's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 16th percentile higher than 16% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2017 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2018 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2020 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2021 | 1 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does Two Trees Photonics Limited patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Two Trees Photonics Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Two Trees Photonics Limited's lead technology class is G03H (Holographic Processes OR Apparatus), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G03H
- Ranked #33,698 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Two Trees Photonics Limited against Tubular Labs, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 24.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.