Overall rank by patents
#37,909
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 5 technology areas, active 2015–2021. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A23B (PRESERVATION OF FOODS, FOODSTUFFS OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; CHEMICAL RIPENING OF FRUIT OR VEGETABLES).
The verdict
TWIN holds 7 US patents across 5 technology areas, rank #37,909 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
TWIN CUPS, Llc has been granted 7 US utility patents between 2015 and 2021, placing TWIN CUPS, Llc at rank #37,909 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 5 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 20.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in A23B (PRESERVATION OF FOODS, FOODSTUFFS OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; CHEMICAL RIPENING OF FRUIT OR VEGETABLES). As a US Corporation, TWIN CUPS, Llc is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, TWIN sits between Tubetamer, Llc (7 patents, rank #37,905) and Taigen Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (7 patents, rank #37,913) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 27.1/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 1 grants, compared with 6 in the 2015–2019 window, a -83% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. TWIN CUPS, Llc's 20.0 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while concentration in 5 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark TWIN CUPS, Llc against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
TUBETAMER, LLC
7 patents
TUFIN SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
7 patents
TURBODEN S.R.L.
7 patents
TWC Patent Trust LLT
7 patents
TYPEMOCK LTD.
7 patents
Taction Technology, Inc.
7 patents
Tagboard, Inc.
7 patents
TaiGen Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
7 patents
TWIN CUPS, LLC
7 patents
What this shows TWIN holds 7 patents at rank #37,909, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #37,909 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in TWIN's primary technology class.
TWIN's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
27 Top 78% higher than 22% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2017 | 3 | 42.9% |
| 2019 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2021 | 1 | 14.3% |
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#37,909
Across all tracked assignees
27.1 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
TWIN's 7 grants land it in the top 78% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.