Where does Turf Design, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Turf Design, Inc. ranks #21,956 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Turf Design, Inc. hold?

Turf Design, Inc. holds 13 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2025, spanning 2 technology areas.

What is Turf Design, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Turf Design, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 32.8 out of 100 (42nd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Turf Design, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Turf Design, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +400% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Turf Design, Inc.'s patents?

Turf Design, Inc.'s patents average 15.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Turf Design, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Turf Design, Inc.

Q: What technology areas does Turf Design, Inc. focus on?

Turf Design, Inc.'s top technology area is E04B (General Building CONSTRUCTIONS; Walls, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; Insulation OR Other Protection OF Buildings) with 13 patents, ranking #52 of 849 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 2 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E04B (General Building CONSTRUCTIONS; Walls, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; Insulation OR Other Protection OF Buildings).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Turf ranks #21,956 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 2 technology areas.

#21,956
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 42nd percentile
by Innovation Score (32.8/100): 15.6
avg claims per patent: +400%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R21956 · US Corporation #21,956 · 13 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
MID-PACK #21,956/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Trilliant Surgical
CPC-NARROW E04B · 2 areas
INNOV-THIN 32.8/100
CLAIMS-RICH 15.6 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +400% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Trilliant Surgical LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Turf’s 32.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.1 pts (28%) Velocity 9.3 pts (28%) Breadth 5.0 pts (15%) Claim depth 9.4 pts (29%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Turf Design · this assignee

33
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Turf's Innovation Score is 32.8/100 (42nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Turf?

Each dot is one of Turf’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Turf’s own 15.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Turf vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Turf's grants concentrate

Turf Design, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under E04B (General Building CONSTRUCTIONS; Walls, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; Insulation OR Other Protection OF Buildings). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Turf sits between Trilliant Surgical LLC and U.S. Government as represented by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Turf's three-year grant acceleration

Turf Design, Inc. shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Trilliant Surgical

13
Troy Industries

13
Truu

13
Truper de C V

13
Tuthill

13
Tyco (Shenzhen)

13
Tyco Holdings (Be…

13
U S Government as…

13
Turf Design ◀

13

What this shows Turf holds 13 patents at rank #21,955, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Turf

By rank, the assignees closest to #21,955 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in E04B (General Building Constructions)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Turf's primary technology class.

Turf's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 42nd percentile higher than 42% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Turf Design, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	2	15.4%
2020	1	7.7%
2021	2	15.4%
2022	1	7.7%
2023	3	23.1%
2024	3	23.1%
2025partial year	1	7.7%

Which technologies does Turf Design, Inc. patent most?

E04B - General Building CONSTRUCTIONS; Walls, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; Insulation OR Other Protection OF Buildings 13

G10K - Sound-producing DEVICES; Methods OR Devices FOR Protecting Against, OR FOR Damping, Noise OR Other Acoustic Waves IN GENERAL; Acoustics NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 7

Top 2 of 2 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Turf Design, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Turf Design, Inc.'s lead technology class is E04B (General Building CONSTRUCTIONS; Walls, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; Insulation OR Other Protection OF Buildings), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E04B
Ranked #21,956 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Turf Design, Inc. against Trilliant Surgical LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 32.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.