Tupl Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 19 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Tupl ranks #15,718 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 19 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #15,718
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 45th percentile
- by Innovation Score (33.6/100)
- 20.6
- avg claims per patent
- +11%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R15718 · US Corporation #15,718 · 19 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 19 grants
- MID-PACK #15,718/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Taiga Biotechnologies
- CPC-NARROW H04L · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 33.6/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 20.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-UP +11% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Taiga Biotechnologies, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Tupl’s 33.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Tupl
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Tupl · this assignee 34
Tupl · this assignee
34 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Tupl's Innovation Score is 33.6/100 (45th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Tupl?
Each dot is one of Tupl’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Tupl’s own 20.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Tupl's grants concentrate
Tupl Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 73.7% of grants classified under H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Tupl sits between Trvstper, Inc. and Tanzle, Inc..
Tupl's three-year grant acceleration
Tupl Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 13 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Tupl's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Trvstper
Trvstper, Inc.
19 patents
- TSE
TSE Co., Ltd.
19 patents
- TSG
TSG Technologies, LLC
19 patents
- Tttech Auto
TTTech Auto AG
19 patents
- Tvworks
TVWorks, LLC
19 patents
- Tyrx
Tyrx, Inc.
19 patents
- Taiga Biotechnolo…
Taiga Biotechnologies, Inc.
19 patents
- Tanzle
Tanzle, Inc.
19 patents
- Tupl ◀
Tupl Inc.
19 patents
What this shows Tupl holds 19 patents at rank #15,693, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Tupl
By rank, the assignees closest to #15,693 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Tupl's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 15,969 in class
- Qualcomm Incorporated 13,594 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 11,697 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 10,543 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 9,062 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 8,543 in class
- Cisco Technology, Inc. 7,502 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 7,301 in class
Tupl's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
34 45th percentile higher than 45% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 5.3% |
| 2018 | 2 | 10.5% |
| 2019 | 6 | 31.6% |
| 2020 | 5 | 26.3% |
| 2021 | 2 | 10.5% |
| 2022 | 3 | 15.8% |
Which technologies does Tupl Inc. patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Tupl Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Tupl Inc.'s lead technology class is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication), 73.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04L
- Ranked #15,718 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Tupl Inc. against Trvstper, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 33.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.