Tudor Watch U.S.A., LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 42 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Tudor ranks #7,790 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 42 patents across 0 technology areas.
- #7,790
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 38th percentile
- by Innovation Score (31.4/100)
- 1.0
- avg claims per patent
- -59%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R7790 · US Corporation #7,790 · 42 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-SMALL 42 grants
- UPPER-Q #7,790/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Swatch
- CPC-UNK CPC blank
- INNOV-THIN 31.4/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -59% vel
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Swatch Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Tudor’s 31.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Tudor
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Cellecta · near 31
Cellecta · near
31 score
- Magnolia Broadband · near 31
Magnolia Broadband · near
31 score
- Whitmor · near 31
Whitmor · near
31 score
- Tudor Watch U · this assignee 31
Tudor Watch U · this assignee
31 score
- Panzura · near 31
Panzura · near
31 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Tudor's Innovation Score is 31.4/100 (38th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Tudor?
Each dot is one of Tudor’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Tudor’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 10.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Tudor's grants concentrate
Tudor Watch U.S.A., LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2015 (13 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, Tudor sits between Swatch Ltd. and ThroughPuter, Inc..
Tudor's three-year grant acceleration
Tudor Watch U.S.A., LLC shows 8 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Tudor's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Swatch
Swatch Ltd.
42 patents
- Tanita
Tanita Corporation
42 patents
- Tovis
Tovis Co., Ltd.
42 patents
- Trinity Rail Group
Trinity Rail Group, LLC
42 patents
- The Methodist Hos…
The Methodist Hospital
42 patents
- The Ritsumeikan T…
The Ritsumeikan Trust
42 patents
- Thin Film ASA
Thin Film Electronics ASA
42 patents
- Throughputer
ThroughPuter, Inc.
42 patents
- Tudor Watch U ◀
Tudor Watch U.S.A., LLC
42 patents
What this shows Tudor holds 42 patents at rank #7,785, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Tudor
By rank, the assignees closest to #7,785 in granted patent volume.
- Swatch Ltd. #7,781 · 42 patents
- Tanita Corporation #7,782 · 42 patents
- Tovis Co., Ltd. #7,783 · 42 patents
- Trinity Rail Group, LLC #7,784 · 42 patents
- The Methodist Hospital #7,786 · 42 patents
- The Ritsumeikan Trust #7,787 · 42 patents
- Thin Film Electronics ASA #7,788 · 42 patents
- ThroughPuter, Inc. #7,789 · 42 patents
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Tudor, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (31 here).
Tudor's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 38th percentile higher than 38% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 13 | 31.0% |
| 2016 | 12 | 28.6% |
| 2017 | 2 | 4.8% |
| 2020 | 3 | 7.1% |
| 2022 | 1 | 2.4% |
| 2023 | 2 | 4.8% |
| 2024 | 5 | 11.9% |
| 2025partial year | 4 | 9.5% |
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Tudor Watch U.S.A., LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Ranked #7,790 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Tudor Watch U.S.A., LLC against Swatch Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 31.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.