USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Tudor Watch U.S.A., LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 42 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Tudor ranks #7,790 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 42 patents across 0 technology areas.

#7,790
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
38th percentile
by Innovation Score (31.4/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent
-59%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R7790 · US Corporation #7,790 · 42 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-SMALL 42 grants
  • UPPER-Q #7,790/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Swatch
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-THIN 31.4/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -59% vel
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Swatch Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Tudor’s 31.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Tudor

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Tudor's Innovation Score is 31.4/100 (38th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Tudor?

Each dot is one of Tudor’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Tudor’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 10.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Tudor vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 41.942.042.04242.042.042.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Swatch Ltd. - 42, 2.71SwatchTanita Corporation - 42, 10.43TanitaTovis Co., Ltd. - 42, 9.48TovisTrinity Rail Group, LLC - 42, 15.69Trinity Rail GroupThe Methodist Hospital - 42, 17.57The Methodist Hos…The Ritsumeikan Trust - 42, 10.29The Ritsumeikan T…Thin Film Electronics ASA - 42, 22.38Thin Film ASAThroughPuter, Inc. - 42, 18.05ThroughputerTudor Watch U.S.A., LLC - 42, 1Tudor Watch U
Tudor vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Tudor's grants concentrate

Tudor Watch U.S.A., LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2015 (13 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, Tudor sits between Swatch Ltd. and ThroughPuter, Inc..

Tudor's three-year grant acceleration

Tudor Watch U.S.A., LLC shows 8 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Tudor's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Tudor holds 42 patents at rank #7,785, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Tudor

By rank, the assignees closest to #7,785 in granted patent volume.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Tudor, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (31 here).

Tudor's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

31 38th percentile higher than 38% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

051015 20152016201720202022202320242025 4
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Tudor Watch U.S.A., LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 13 31.0%
2016 12 28.6%
2017 2 4.8%
2020 3 7.1%
2022 1 2.4%
2023 2 4.8%
2024 5 11.9%
2025partial year 4 9.5%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Tudor Watch U.S.A., LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #7,790 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Tudor Watch U.S.A., LLC against Swatch Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 31.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.