Overall rank by patents
#25,422
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 3 technology areas, active 2015–2022. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: H04W (WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS).
The verdict
Trapeze holds 11 US patents across 3 technology areas, rank #25,422 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Trapeze Networks, Inc. has been granted 11 US utility patents between 2015 and 2022, placing Trapeze Networks, Inc. at rank #25,422 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 3 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 18.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in H04W (WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS). As a US Corporation, Trapeze Networks, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Trapeze sits between Touratech Ag (11 patents, rank #25,418) and Truvian Sciences, Inc. (11 patents, rank #25,426) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 27.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 4 grants, compared with 7 in the 2015–2019 window, a -43% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Trapeze Networks, Inc.'s 18.8 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while specialization in 3 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Trapeze Networks, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Touratech AG
11 patents
Toyota Body Seiko Co., Ltd.
11 patents
Trace Matters Scientific LLC
11 patents
Trade Box, Inc.
11 patents
TricornTech Taiwan
11 patents
Trident Limited
11 patents
TrueVision Systems, Inc.
11 patents
Truvian Sciences, Inc.
11 patents
Trapeze Networks, Inc.
11 patents
What this shows Trapeze holds 11 patents at rank #25,422, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Trapeze's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 Top 76% higher than 24% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2016 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2017 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2019 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2020 | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2022 | 1 | 9.1% |
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#25,422
Across all tracked assignees
27.7 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Trapeze's 11 grants land it in the top 76% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.