TRA Company Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, TRA ranks #43,730 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 0 technology areas.
- #43,730
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 0th percentile
- by Innovation Score (7.3/100)
- 1.0
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R43730 · Foreign Corporation #43,730 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #43,730/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Toyish Labs
- CPC-UNK CPC blank
- INNOV-LOW 7.3/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Toyish Labs Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How TRA’s 7.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around TRA
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- TRA · this assignee 7
TRA · this assignee
7 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows TRA's Innovation Score is 7.3/100 (0th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for TRA?
Each dot is one of TRA’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). TRA’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 6.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where TRA's grants concentrate
TRA Company Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2015 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, TRA sits between Toyish Labs Inc. and Tri-edge Industries, LLC.
Who files at TRA's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Toyish Labs
Toyish Labs Inc.
6 patents
- Toyokoh
Toyokoh Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Toyota Motor Engi…
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North Inc
6 patents
- Toyota Production…
Toyota Production Engineering
6 patents
- Travel Blue
Travel Blue Limited
6 patents
- Trebco
Trebco LLC
6 patents
- Treetotextile AB
Treetotextile AB
6 patents
- Tri-edge Industri…
Tri-edge Industries, LLC
6 patents
- TRA ◀
TRA Company Ltd.
6 patents
What this shows TRA holds 6 patents at rank #43,580, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near TRA
By rank, the assignees closest to #43,580 in granted patent volume.
- Toyish Labs Inc. #43,576 · 6 patents
- Toyokoh Co., Ltd. #43,577 · 6 patents
- Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North Inc #43,578 · 6 patents
- Toyota Production Engineering #43,579 · 6 patents
- Travel Blue Limited #43,581 · 6 patents
- Trebco LLC #43,582 · 6 patents
- Treetotextile AB #43,583 · 6 patents
- Tri-edge Industries, LLC #43,584 · 6 patents
TRA's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
7 0th percentile higher than 0% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2016 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
TRA Company Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Ranked #43,730 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare TRA Company Ltd. against Toyish Labs Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 7.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.