Overall rank by patents
#3,581
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 103 granted patents across 66 technology areas, active 2022–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: C07C (ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS).
The verdict
Totalenergies holds 103 US patents across 66 technology areas, rank #3,581 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Totalenergies Onetech has been granted 103 US utility patents between 2022 and 2025, placing Totalenergies Onetech at rank #3,581 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 66 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 16.1 claims per patent with primary concentration in C07C (ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS). As a Foreign Corporation, Totalenergies Onetech is one of the broader-portfolio assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Totalenergies sits between Suzhou China STAR Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. (103 patents, rank #3,577) and Acist Medical Systems Inc. (102 patents, rank #3,585) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 70.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2022 through 2025, with 103 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Totalenergies Onetech's 16.1 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 66 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Totalenergies Onetech against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
SUZHOU CHINA STAR OPTOELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
103 patents
Solenis Technologies, L.P.
103 patents
Surmodics, Inc.
103 patents
Synaptics Japan GK
103 patents
UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DIDEROT—PARIS 7
103 patents
Valmet Technologies Oy
103 patents
TOTALENERGIES ONETECH
103 patents
3form, LLC
102 patents
ACIST MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC.
102 patents
What this shows Totalenergies holds 103 patents at rank #3,581, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #3,581 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Totalenergies's primary technology class.
Totalenergies's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
71 Top 1% higher than 99% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 3 | 2.9% |
| 2023 | 13 | 12.6% |
| 2024 | 49 | 47.6% |
| 2025 | 38 | 36.9% |
Top 15 of 66 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#3,581
Across all tracked assignees
70.7 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Totalenergies's 103 grants land it in the top 0.1% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.