Where does Total Raffinage Marketing rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Total Raffinage Marketing ranks #12,270 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Total Raffinage Marketing hold?

Total Raffinage Marketing holds 25 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2022, spanning 24 technology areas.

What is Total Raffinage Marketing's Innovation Score?

Total Raffinage Marketing has an Innovation Score of 46.5 out of 100 (top 20% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Total Raffinage Marketing focus on?

Total Raffinage Marketing's top technology area is B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus) with 13 patents, ranking #365 of 2,755 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 24 CPC subclasses total.

Is Total Raffinage Marketing's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Total Raffinage Marketing's recent grant velocity is -91% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Total Raffinage Marketing's patents?

Total Raffinage Marketing's patents average 18.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Total Raffinage Marketing patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Total Raffinage Marketing

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 25 granted patents across 24 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Total ranks #12,270 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 25 patents across 24 technology areas.

#12,270
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 20%
by Innovation Score (46.5/100): 18.8
avg claims per patent: -91%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R12270 · Foreign Corporation #12,270 · 25 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 25 grants
UPPER-Q #12,270/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH TangoMe
CPC-FOCUS B01J · 24 areas
INNOV-PAR 46.5/100
CLAIMS-RICH 18.8 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -91% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: TangoMe, Inc (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Total’s 46.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.3 pts (24%) Velocity 6.7 pts (14%) Breadth 17.3 pts (37%) Claim depth 11.3 pts (24%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Cognizant Technology… · near

47
Muhr UND Bender KG · near

47
Nomura Research… · near

47
Total Raffinage… · this assignee

47
University OF THE… · near

47
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Total's Innovation Score is 46.5/100 (top 20% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Total?

Each dot is one of Total’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Total’s own 18.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Total vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Total's grants concentrate

Total Raffinage Marketing is a focused PatentsView assignee: 24 CPC subclasses with 52% of grants classified under B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (14 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Total sits between TEL FSI, Inc. and TangoMe, Inc.

Total's three-year grant acceleration

Total Raffinage Marketing shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

TEL FSI

25
Tela Bio

25
THE Hi-tech Robot…

25
THE Parallax Grou…

25
Tri-force Managem…

25
Trumpf + KG

25
Tuesday Morning P…

25
Tangome

25
Total Raffinage M… ◀

25

What this shows Total holds 25 patents at rank #12,255, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Total

By rank, the assignees closest to #12,255 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Total's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Total, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes), Total ranks #365 of 2,755 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (47 here).

University OF THE Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 47 Muhr UND Bender KG 47 Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation 47 Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. 47

Total's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

47 Top 20% higher than 80% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Total Raffinage Marketing patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	14	56.0%
2016	7	28.0%
2017	1	4.0%
2018	1	4.0%
2021	1	4.0%
2022	1	4.0%

Which technologies does Total Raffinage Marketing patent most?

B01J - Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus 13

C10G - Cracking Hydrocarbon OILS; Production OF Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixtures, e.g. BY Destructive Hydrogenation, Oligomerisation, Polymerisation ; Recovery OF Hydrocarbon Oils From Oil-shale, Oil-sand, OR GASES; Refining Mixtures Mainly Consisting OF HYDROCARBONS; Reforming OF NAPHTHA; Mineral Waxes 13

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 6

C10L - Fuels NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Natural GAS; Synthetic Natural GAS Obtained BY Processes NOT Covered BY Subclasses C10g OR C10K; Liquified Petroleum GAS; USE OF Additives TO Fuels OR FIRES; Fire-lighters 5

C08L - Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds 3

C08G - Macromolecular Compounds Obtained Otherwise Than BY Reactions Only Involving Unsaturated Carbon-to-carbon Bonds 2

B65G - Transport OR Storage Devices, e.g. Conveyors FOR Loading OR Tipping, Shop Conveyor Systems OR Pneumatic Tube Conveyors 2

C08K - Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients 2

C07C - Acyclic OR Carbocyclic Compounds 2

C10M - Lubricating Compositions ; USE OF Chemical Substances Either Alone OR AS Lubricating Ingredients IN A Lubricating Composition 2

C10N - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass C10m Relating TO Lubricating Compositions 2

G01F - Measuring Volume, Volume Flow, Mass Flow OR Liquid LEVEL; Metering BY Volume 1

F01M - Lubricating OF Machines OR Engines IN GENERAL; Lubricating Internal Combustion ENGINES; Crankcase Ventilating 1

B01D - Separation 1

C09D - Coating Compositions, e.g. Paints, Varnishes OR LACQUERS; Filling PASTES; Chemical Paint OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; Correcting FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; Pastes OR Solids FOR Colouring OR PRINTING; USE OF Materials Therefor 1

Top 15 of 24 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Total Raffinage Marketing's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Total Raffinage Marketing's lead technology class is B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus), 52% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B01J
Ranked #12,270 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Total Raffinage Marketing against TEL FSI, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 46.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.