Time To Act Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Time ranks #33,633 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #33,633
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 25th percentile
- by Innovation Score (27.9/100)
- 15.4
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R33633 · Foreign Corporation #33,633 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #33,633/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Tianjin Deepfar…
- CPC-NARROW H02K · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 27.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- SPAN-YRS 2020–2024 · 5y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Tianjin Deepfar Ocean Technology Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Time’s 27.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Time
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Time To Act · this assignee 28
Time To Act · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Time's Innovation Score is 27.9/100 (25th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Time?
Each dot is one of Time’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Time’s own 15.4 claims/patent is at or below the 17.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Time's grants concentrate
Time To Act Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2024. By volume, Time sits between Tianjin Deepfar Ocean Technology Co., Ltd. and Todos Technologies Ltd..
Time's three-year grant acceleration
Time To Act Limited shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Time's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Tianjin Deepfar O…
Tianjin Deepfar Ocean Technology Co., Ltd.
8 patents
- Tienovix
Tienovix, LLC
8 patents
- Tighitco
Tighitco, Inc.
8 patents
- Tillster
Tillster, Inc.
8 patents
- Tinoq
Tinoq Inc.
8 patents
- Titan Oil Recovery
Titan Oil Recovery, Inc.
8 patents
- Titanliner
TitanLiner, Inc.
8 patents
- Todos
Todos Technologies Ltd.
8 patents
- Time To Act ◀
Time To Act Limited
8 patents
What this shows Time holds 8 patents at rank #33,652, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Time
By rank, the assignees closest to #33,652 in granted patent volume.
- Tianjin Deepfar Ocean Technology Co., Ltd. #33,648 · 8 patents
- Tienovix, LLC #33,649 · 8 patents
- Tighitco, Inc. #33,650 · 8 patents
- Tillster, Inc. #33,651 · 8 patents
- Tinoq Inc. #33,653 · 8 patents
- Titan Oil Recovery, Inc. #33,654 · 8 patents
- TitanLiner, Inc. #33,655 · 8 patents
- Todos Technologies Ltd. #33,656 · 8 patents
Leaders in H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Time's primary technology class.
Time's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 25th percentile higher than 25% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 3 | 37.5% |
| 2021 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2022 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does Time To Act Limited patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Time To Act Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Time To Act Limited's lead technology class is H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H02K
- Ranked #33,633 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Time To Act Limited against Tianjin Deepfar Ocean Technology Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 27.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.