Where does Time Machine Capital Limited rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Time Machine Capital Limited ranks #43,670 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Time Machine Capital Limited hold?

Time Machine Capital Limited holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2021, spanning 8 technology areas.

What is Time Machine Capital Limited's Innovation Score?

Time Machine Capital Limited has an Innovation Score of 28.4 out of 100 (27th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Time Machine Capital Limited focus on?

Time Machine Capital Limited's top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 5 patents, ranking #6,197 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 8 CPC subclasses total.

Is Time Machine Capital Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Time Machine Capital Limited's recent grant velocity is -50% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Time Machine Capital Limited's patents?

Time Machine Capital Limited's patents average 19.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Time Machine Capital Limited patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Time Machine Capital Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Time ranks #43,670 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 8 technology areas.

#43,670
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 27th percentile
by Innovation Score (28.4/100): 19.5
avg claims per patent: -50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R43670 · Foreign Corporation #43,670 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #43,670/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Tianjin Yolin…
CPC-NARROW G06F · 8 areas
INNOV-THIN 28.4/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.5 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -50% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Tianjin Yolin Technology Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Time’s 28.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (24%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 10.0 pts (35%) Claim depth 11.7 pts (41%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Time Machine Capital · this assignee

28
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Time's Innovation Score is 28.4/100 (27th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Time?

Each dot is one of Time’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Time’s own 19.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Time vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Time's grants concentrate

Time Machine Capital Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Time sits between Tianjin Yolin Technology Co., Ltd. and Tippmann Sports, LLC.

Tianjin Yolin Tec…

6
Tidaix AI

6
Tiffany & Swiss W…

6
Tigertext

6
Timpte Industries

6
Tinfoil Security

6
Ting Theropeutics

6
Tippmann Sports

6
Time Machine Capi… ◀

6

What this shows Time holds 6 patents at rank #43,697, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Time

By rank, the assignees closest to #43,697 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Time's primary technology class.

Time's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

28 27th percentile higher than 27% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Time Machine Capital Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	1	16.7%
2018	1	16.7%
2019	2	33.3%
2020	1	16.7%
2021	1	16.7%

Which technologies does Time Machine Capital Limited patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 5

G11B - Information Storage Based ON Relative Movement Between Record Carrier AND Transducer 5

A63B - Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment 4

G10H - Electrophonic Musical INSTRUMENTS; Instruments IN Which THE Tones ARE Generated BY Electromechanical Means OR Electronic Generators, OR IN Which THE Tones ARE Synthesised From A Data Store 3

H04H - Broadcast Communication 3

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 3

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 2

G01S - Radio DIRECTION-FINDING; Radio NAVIGATION; Determining Distance OR Velocity BY USE OF Radio WAVES; Locating OR Presence-detecting BY USE OF THE Reflection OR Reradiation OF Radio WAVES; Analogous Arrangements Using Other Waves 1

Top 8 of 8 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Time Machine Capital Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Time Machine Capital Limited's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #43,670 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Time Machine Capital Limited against Tianjin Yolin Technology Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 28.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.