USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Tiffany AND Company

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 54 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Tiffany ranks #6,293 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 54 patents across 0 technology areas.

#6,293
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
16th percentile
by Innovation Score (25.0/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent
+8%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R6293 · US Corporation #6,293 · 54 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-SMALL 54 grants
  • UPPER-Q #6,293/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Shanghai Xiaodu…
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-THIN 25.0/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-FLAT +8% vel
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Shanghai Xiaodu Technology Co. Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Tiffany’s 25.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Tiffany

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Tiffany's Innovation Score is 25.0/100 (16th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Tiffany?

Each dot is one of Tiffany’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Tiffany’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 15.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Tiffany vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 53.954.054.05454.054.054.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Shanghai Xiaodu Technology Co. Ltd. - 54, 15.41Shanghai Xiaodu T…Sloan Valve Company - 54, 12.2Sloan ValveSony Network Entertainment International LLC - 54, 20.2Sony Network Ente…SubCom, LLC - 54, 16.89SubcomTLV Co., Ltd. - 54, 5.83TLVToho Titanium Co., Ltd. - 54, 9.26Toho TitaniumTripwire, Inc. - 54, 20.26TripwireTakara Bio USA, Inc. - 54, 20.28Takara Bio USATiffany AND Company - 54, 1Tiffany AND
Tiffany vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Tiffany's grants concentrate

Tiffany AND Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2024 (15 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Tiffany sits between Shanghai Xiaodu Technology Co. Ltd. and Takara Bio USA, Inc..

Tiffany's three-year grant acceleration

Tiffany AND Company shows 19 grants in 2022–2024 against only 12 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Tiffany's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Tiffany holds 54 patents at rank #6,286, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Tiffany

By rank, the assignees closest to #6,286 in granted patent volume.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Tiffany, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Tiffany's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

25 16th percentile higher than 16% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

05101520 201520162017201820192020202120232024 15
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Tiffany AND Company patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 1.9%
2016 3 5.6%
2017 14 25.9%
2018 5 9.3%
2019 3 5.6%
2020 3 5.6%
2021 6 11.1%
2023 4 7.4%
2024 15 27.8%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Tiffany AND Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #6,293 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Tiffany AND Company against Shanghai Xiaodu Technology Co. Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 25.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.