Three Seven Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment ; Equipment FOR Cosmetics OR Cosmetic Treatments, e.g. FOR Manicuring OR Pedicuring).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Three ranks #33,621 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #33,621
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 2nd percentile
- by Innovation Score (13.1/100)
- 3.3
- avg claims per patent
- -67%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R33621 · Foreign Corporation #33,621 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #33,621/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Think Silicon
- CPC-NARROW A45D · 1 areas
- INNOV-LOW 13.1/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 3.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -67% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Think Silicon SA (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Three’s 13.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Three
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Three Seven · this assignee 13
Three Seven · this assignee
13 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Three's Innovation Score is 13.1/100 (2nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Three?
Each dot is one of Three’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Three’s own 3.3 claims/patent is at or below the 19.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Three's grants concentrate
Three Seven Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 12.5% of grants classified under A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment ; Equipment FOR Cosmetics OR Cosmetic Treatments, e.g. FOR Manicuring OR Pedicuring). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Three sits between Think Silicon SA and Tighitco, Inc..
Who files at Three's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Think Silicon
Think Silicon SA
8 patents
- Thinkspan
Thinkspan, LLC
8 patents
- Threatconnect
ThreatConnect, Inc.
8 patents
- Thredup
ThredUp Inc.
8 patents
- Thuuz
Thuuz, Inc.
8 patents
- Tianjin Deepfar O…
Tianjin Deepfar Ocean Technology Co., Ltd.
8 patents
- Tienovix
Tienovix, LLC
8 patents
- Tighitco
Tighitco, Inc.
8 patents
- Three Seven ◀
Three Seven Corporation
8 patents
What this shows Three holds 8 patents at rank #33,646, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Three
By rank, the assignees closest to #33,646 in granted patent volume.
- Think Silicon SA #33,642 · 8 patents
- Thinkspan, LLC #33,643 · 8 patents
- ThreatConnect, Inc. #33,644 · 8 patents
- ThredUp Inc. #33,645 · 8 patents
- Thuuz, Inc. #33,647 · 8 patents
- Tianjin Deepfar Ocean Technology Co., Ltd. #33,648 · 8 patents
- Tienovix, LLC #33,649 · 8 patents
- Tighitco, Inc. #33,650 · 8 patents
Leaders in A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Three's primary technology class.
Three's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
13 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2019 | 5 | 62.5% |
| 2020 | 2 | 25.0% |
Which technologies does Three Seven Corporation patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Three Seven Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Three Seven Corporation's lead technology class is A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment ; Equipment FOR Cosmetics OR Cosmetic Treatments, e.g. FOR Manicuring OR Pedicuring), 12.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A45D
- Ranked #33,621 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Three Seven Corporation against Think Silicon SA, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 13.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.