Where does Think Green Limited rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Think Green Limited ranks #8,125 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Think Green Limited hold?

Think Green Limited holds 40 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2025, spanning 1 technology areas.

What is Think Green Limited's Innovation Score?

Think Green Limited has an Innovation Score of 37.2 out of 100 (top 44% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Think Green Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Think Green Limited's recent grant velocity is +3700% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Think Green Limited's patents?

Think Green Limited's patents average 1.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Think Green Limited patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Think Green Limited

Q: What technology areas does Think Green Limited focus on?

Think Green Limited's top technology area is A61J (Containers Specially Adapted FOR Medical OR Pharmaceutical PURPOSES; Devices OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Bringing Pharmaceutical Products Into Particular Physical OR Administering FORMS; Devices FOR Administering Food OR Medicines ORALLY; Baby COMFORTERS; Devices FOR Receiving Spittle) with 1 patents, ranking #547 of 903 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 1 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 40 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61J (Containers Specially Adapted FOR Medical OR Pharmaceutical PURPOSES; Devices OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Bringing Pharmaceutical Products Into Particular Physical OR Administering FORMS; Devices ).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Think ranks #8,125 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 40 patents across 1 technology areas.

#8,125
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 44%
by Innovation Score (37.2/100): 1.4
avg claims per patent: +3700%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R8125 · Foreign Corporation #8,125 · 40 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 40 grants
UPPER-Q #8,125/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Suncall
CPC-NARROW A61J · 1 areas
INNOV-THIN 37.2/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.4 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +3700% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Suncall Corporation (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Think’s 37.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 12.8 pts (34%) Velocity 20.0 pts (54%) Breadth 3.5 pts (9%) Claim depth 0.9 pts (2%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Crimson Trace · near

37
Easton Diamond Sports · near

37
Intelligent Medical… · near

37
NETZCH-Feinmahltechnik · near

37
Think Green · this assignee

37
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Think's Innovation Score is 37.2/100 (top 44% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Think?

Each dot is one of Think’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Think’s own 1.4 claims/patent is at or below the 9.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Think vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Think's grants concentrate

Think Green Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 2.5% of grants classified under A61J (Containers Specially Adapted FOR Medical OR Pharmaceutical PURPOSES; Devices OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Bringing Pharmaceutical Products Into Particular Physical OR Administering FORMS; Devices ). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (15 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Think sits between Suncall Corporation and Tymphany Acoustic Technology (HUIZHOU) Co., Ltd..

Think's three-year grant acceleration

Think Green Limited shows 31 grants in 2022–2024 against only 8 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Suncall

40
Swarovski Aktieng…

40
TDA Research

40
THE School Kansai…

40
Toray Engineering

40
Toyo Gosei

40
Tusas—TURK Havaci…

40
Tymphany Acoustic…

40
Think Green ◀

40

What this shows Think holds 40 patents at rank #8,122, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Think

By rank, the assignees closest to #8,122 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61J (Containers Specially Adapted FOR Medical OR Pharmaceutica…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Think's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Think, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A61J (Containers Specially Adapted FOR Medical OR Pharmaceutica…), Think ranks #547 of 903 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (37 here).

Easton Diamond Sports, LLC 37 NETZCH-Feinmahltechnik GmbH 37 Crimson Trace Corporation 37 Intelligent Medical Objects, Inc. 37

Think's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

37 Top 44% higher than 56% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Think Green Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	1	2.5%
2021	7	17.5%
2022	15	37.5%
2023	11	27.5%
2024	5	12.5%
2025partial year	1	2.5%

Which technologies does Think Green Limited patent most?

A61J - Containers Specially Adapted FOR Medical OR Pharmaceutical PURPOSES; Devices OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Bringing Pharmaceutical Products Into Particular Physical OR Administering FORMS; Devices FOR Administering Food OR Medicines ORALLY; Baby COMFORTERS; Devices FOR Receiving Spittle 1

Top 1 of 1 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Think Green Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Think Green Limited's lead technology class is A61J (Containers Specially Adapted FOR Medical OR Pharmaceutical PURPOSES; Devices OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Bringing Pharmaceutical Products Into Particular Physical OR Administering FORMS; Devices ), 2.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61J
Ranked #8,125 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Think Green Limited against Suncall Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 37.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.