Overall rank by patents
#25,398
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 24 technology areas, active 2015–2023. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B01J (CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS).
The verdict
The holds 11 US patents across 24 technology areas, rank #25,398 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
The University Of Canterbury has been granted 11 US utility patents between 2015 and 2023, placing The University Of Canterbury at rank #25,398 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 24 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 19.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in B01J (CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS). As a Foreign Corporation, The University Of Canterbury is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, The sits between The Island Radar Company (11 patents, rank #25,394) and Thermo Fisher Scientific (ecublens) SARL (11 patents, rank #25,402) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 46.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 7 grants, compared with 4 in the 2015–2019 window, a +75% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. The University Of Canterbury's 19.6 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 24 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark The University Of Canterbury against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
The Island Radar Company
11 patents
The Nemours Foundation
11 patents
The Notebook, LLC
11 patents
The Swatch Group Management Services AG
11 patents
Theracell, LLC
11 patents
Theravance Respiratory Company, LLC
11 patents
Theriva Biologics, Inc.
11 patents
Thermo Fisher Scientific (Ecublens) SARL
11 patents
The University of Canterbury
11 patents
What this shows The holds 11 patents at rank #25,398, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
The's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
47 Top 20% higher than 80% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2016 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2017 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2018 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2020 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2021 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2022 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2023 | 2 | 18.2% |
Top 15 of 24 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#25,398
Across all tracked assignees
46.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
The's 11 grants land it in the top 20% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.