PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

The Travel Hammock Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, The ranks #37,926 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 0 technology areas.

#37,926
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
1st percentile
by Innovation Score (7.8/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R37926 · US Corporation #37,926 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
  • LOWER-Q #37,926/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH The State of Oregon…
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-LOW 7.8/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: The State of Oregon Acting by and through the State Board of Higher Education on Behalf of the University of Oregon (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How The’s 7.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around The

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows The's Innovation Score is 7.8/100 (1st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for The?

Each dot is one of The’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). The’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 14.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

The vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 6.97.07.077.07.07.1 05101520 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent The State of Oregon Acting by and through the State Board of Higher Education on Behalf of the University of Oregon - 7, 18.29The State of Oreg…The Subsea Company - 7, 15.57The SubseaThe Sun Products Corporation - 7, 10The Sun ProductsThe Topps Company, Inc. - 7, 3.57The ToppsThe Trustees of Princeton University, Office of Technology and Trademark Licensing - 7, 15.86The Trustees of P…The United States Playing Card Company - 7, 7The United States…The United States of America, as represented by the Secretary, Health and Human Services - 7, 15.14The United States…The Willamette Valley Company LLC - 7, 14.86The Willamette Va…The Travel Hammock Inc. - 7, 1The Travel Hammock
The vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where The's grants concentrate

The Travel Hammock Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2016 (4 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2017. By volume, The sits between The State of Oregon Acting by and through the State Board of Higher Education on Behalf of the University of Oregon and The Willamette Valley Company LLC.

Who files at The's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows The holds 7 patents at rank #37,973, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near The

By rank, the assignees closest to #37,973 in granted patent volume.

The's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

8 1st percentile higher than 1% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

2.533.544.5 20162017 3
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2017

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
The Travel Hammock Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 4 57.1%
2017 3 42.9%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

The Travel Hammock Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #37,926 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare The Travel Hammock Inc. against The State of Oregon Acting by and through the State Board of Higher Education on Behalf of the University of Oregon, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 7.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.