USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

The Ontario Knife Company

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, The ranks #37,911 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 0 technology areas.

#37,911
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
3rd percentile
by Innovation Score (14.4/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent
-83%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R37911 · US Corporation #37,911 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
  • LOWER-Q #37,911/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH The Global Alliance…
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-LOW 14.4/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -83% vel
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: The Global Alliance for TB Drug Development, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How The’s 14.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around The

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows The's Innovation Score is 14.4/100 (3rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for The?

Each dot is one of The’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). The’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 14.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

The vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 6.97.07.077.07.07.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent The Global Alliance for TB Drug Development, Inc. - 7, 16.71The Global Allian…The Joan and Irwin Jacobs Technion-Cornell Innovation Institute - 7, 11.57The Joan and Irwi…The Meet Group, Inc. - 7, 14.71The Meet GroupThe Neilsen Company (US), LLC - 7, 20.43The Neilsen (US)The Parking Genius, Inc. - 7, 19The Parking GeniusThe Research Foundation for The State University o - 7, 19.29The Research Foun…The Safety Network Partnership, LLC - 7, 11.43The Safety Networ…The Shepherd Color Company - 7, 14.29The Shepherd ColorThe Ontario Knife Company - 7, 1The Ontario Knife
The vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where The's grants concentrate

The Ontario Knife Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2017 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, The sits between The Global Alliance for TB Drug Development, Inc. and The Shepherd Color Company.

The's three-year grant acceleration

The Ontario Knife Company shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at The's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows The holds 7 patents at rank #37,963, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near The

By rank, the assignees closest to #37,963 in granted patent volume.

The's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

14 3rd percentile higher than 3% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.5 20152016201720182023 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
The Ontario Knife Company patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 14.3%
2016 1 14.3%
2017 2 28.6%
2018 2 28.6%
2023 1 14.3%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

The Ontario Knife Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #37,911 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare The Ontario Knife Company against The Global Alliance for TB Drug Development, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 14.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.