The Curotto-Can, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B65F (Gathering OR Removal OF Domestic OR Like Refuse).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, The ranks #20,515 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 9 technology areas.
- #20,515
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 31st percentile
- by Innovation Score (29.5/100)
- 15.9
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R20515 · US Corporation #20,515 · 14 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
- MID-PACK #20,515/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Terex South Dakota
- CPC-NARROW B65F · 9 areas
- INNOV-THIN 29.5/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Terex South Dakota, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How The’s 29.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around The
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- The Curotto-Can · this assignee 29
The Curotto-Can · this assignee
29 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows The's Innovation Score is 29.5/100 (31st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for The?
Each dot is one of The’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). The’s own 15.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where The's grants concentrate
The Curotto-Can, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under B65F (Gathering OR Removal OF Domestic OR Like Refuse). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, The sits between Terex South Dakota, Inc. and The Research Foundation for SUNY.
Who files at The's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Terex South Dakota
Terex South Dakota, Inc.
14 patents
- The Azek Group
The Azek Group LLC
14 patents
- The BIG O
The BIG O, LLC
14 patents
- The Crawford Group
The Crawford Group, Inc.
14 patents
- The Foundation fo…
The Foundation for the Promotion of Industrial Science
14 patents
- The Maitland
The Maitland Company, LLC
14 patents
- The Nielson (US)
The Nielson Company (US), LLC
14 patents
- The Research Foun…
The Research Foundation for SUNY
14 patents
- The Curotto-can ◀
The Curotto-Can, LLC
14 patents
What this shows The holds 14 patents at rank #20,534, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near The
By rank, the assignees closest to #20,534 in granted patent volume.
- Terex South Dakota, Inc. #20,530 · 14 patents
- The Azek Group LLC #20,531 · 14 patents
- The BIG O, LLC #20,532 · 14 patents
- The Crawford Group, Inc. #20,533 · 14 patents
- The Foundation for the Promotion of Industrial Science #20,535 · 14 patents
- The Maitland Company, LLC #20,536 · 14 patents
- The Nielson Company (US), LLC #20,537 · 14 patents
- The Research Foundation for SUNY #20,538 · 14 patents
Leaders in B65F (Gathering OR Removal OF Domestic OR Like Refuse)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in The's primary technology class.
The's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
29 31st percentile higher than 31% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 14.3% |
| 2016 | 5 | 35.7% |
| 2017 | 2 | 14.3% |
| 2018 | 4 | 28.6% |
| 2019 | 1 | 7.1% |
Which technologies does The Curotto-Can, LLC patent most?
Top 9 of 9 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
The Curotto-Can, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- The Curotto-Can, LLC's lead technology class is B65F (Gathering OR Removal OF Domestic OR Like Refuse), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B65F
- Ranked #20,515 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare The Curotto-Can, LLC against Terex South Dakota, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 29.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.