Where does Textor Maschinenbau GmbH rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Textor Maschinenbau GmbH ranks #21,890 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Textor Maschinenbau GmbH hold?

Textor Maschinenbau GmbH holds 13 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2024, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is Textor Maschinenbau GmbH's Innovation Score?

Textor Maschinenbau GmbH has an Innovation Score of 37.9 out of 100 (top 42% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Textor Maschinenbau GmbH's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Textor Maschinenbau GmbH's recent grant velocity is +125% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Textor Maschinenbau GmbH's patents?

Textor Maschinenbau GmbH's patents average 21.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Textor Maschinenbau GmbH patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Textor Maschinenbau GmbH

Q: What technology areas does Textor Maschinenbau GmbH focus on?

Textor Maschinenbau GmbH's top technology area is B26D (CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing) with 10 patents, ranking #24 of 595 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B26D (CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Textor ranks #21,890 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 7 technology areas.

#21,890
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 42%
by Innovation Score (37.9/100): 21.2
avg claims per patent: +125%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R21890 · Foreign Corporation #21,890 · 13 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
MID-PACK #21,890/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Tentsile
CPC-NARROW B26D · 7 areas
INNOV-THIN 37.9/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 21.2 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +125% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Tentsile Ltd (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Textor’s 37.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.1 pts (24%) Velocity 6.7 pts (18%) Breadth 9.4 pts (25%) Claim depth 12.7 pts (34%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Textor Maschinenbau · this assignee

38
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Textor's Innovation Score is 37.9/100 (top 42% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Textor?

Each dot is one of Textor’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Textor’s own 21.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Textor vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Textor's grants concentrate

Textor Maschinenbau GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 76.9% of grants classified under B26D (CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Textor sits between Tentsile Ltd and THE Diller Corporation.

Textor's three-year grant acceleration

Textor Maschinenbau GmbH shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Tentsile

13
Terralithium

13
Terranet AB

13
TES

13
THD S P A

13
THE Board OF Trus…

13
THE Chinese Unive…

13
THE Diller

13
Textor Maschinenb… ◀

13

What this shows Textor holds 13 patents at rank #21,877, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Textor

By rank, the assignees closest to #21,877 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B26D (Cutting)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Textor's primary technology class.

Textor's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

38 Top 42% higher than 58% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Textor Maschinenbau GmbH patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	7.7%
2017	1	7.7%
2018	1	7.7%
2019	1	7.7%
2020	4	30.8%
2022	1	7.7%
2023	1	7.7%
2024	3	23.1%

Which technologies does Textor Maschinenbau GmbH patent most?

B26D - CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing 10

B65G - Transport OR Storage Devices, e.g. Conveyors FOR Loading OR Tipping, Shop Conveyor Systems OR Pneumatic Tube Conveyors 5

A22C - Processing Meat, Poultry, OR Fish 4

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 4

B30B - Presses IN General 2

B65B - Machines, Apparatus OR Devices FOR, OR Methods OF, Packaging Articles OR MATERIALS; Unpacking 1

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 1

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Textor Maschinenbau GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Textor Maschinenbau GmbH's lead technology class is B26D (CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing), 76.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B26D
Ranked #21,890 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Textor Maschinenbau GmbH against Tentsile Ltd, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 37.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.