Overall rank by patents
#25,342
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 5 technology areas, active 2016–2020. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: H04L (TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION).
The verdict
Teoco holds 11 US patents across 5 technology areas, rank #25,342 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Teoco Ltd. has been granted 11 US utility patents between 2016 and 2020, placing Teoco Ltd. at rank #25,342 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 5 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 24.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in H04L (TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION). As a Foreign Corporation, Teoco Ltd. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Teoco sits between Teledyne Dalsa, Inc. (11 patents, rank #25,338) and Tevosol, Inc. (11 patents, rank #25,346) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 31.3/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 3 grants, compared with 8 in the 2015–2019 window, a -62% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Teoco Ltd.'s 24.6 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while concentration in 5 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Teoco Ltd. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
TELEDYNE DALSA, INC.
11 patents
TELEFLEX LIFE SCIENCES PTE. LTD.
11 patents
TELUS Communications Inc.
11 patents
TEMPEST THERAPEUTICS, INC.
11 patents
TERCEL IP LIMITED
11 patents
TERZANI S.R.L.
11 patents
TETRASUN, INC.
11 patents
TEVOSOL, INC.
11 patents
TEOCO LTD.
11 patents
What this shows Teoco holds 11 patents at rank #25,342, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Teoco's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 Top 63% higher than 37% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2017 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2019 | 4 | 36.4% |
| 2020 | 3 | 27.3% |
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#25,342
Across all tracked assignees
31.3 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Teoco's 11 grants land it in the top 63% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.