TEE Turtle, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63H (Toys, e.g. Tops, Dolls, Hoops OR Building Blocks).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, TEE ranks #30,346 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #30,346
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 19th percentile
- by Innovation Score (26.1/100)
- 13.2
- avg claims per patent
- +67%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R30346 · US Corporation #30,346 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
- MID-PACK #30,346/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Tecat (SUZHOU)
- CPC-NARROW A63H · 1 areas
- INNOV-THIN 26.1/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 13.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +67% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Tecat Technologies (SUZHOU) Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How TEE’s 26.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around TEE
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- TEE Turtle · this assignee 26
TEE Turtle · this assignee
26 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows TEE's Innovation Score is 26.1/100 (19th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for TEE?
Each dot is one of TEE’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). TEE’s own 13.2 claims/patent is at or below the 15.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where TEE's grants concentrate
TEE Turtle, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 55.6% of grants classified under A63H (Toys, e.g. Tops, Dolls, Hoops OR Building Blocks). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, TEE sits between Tecat Technologies (SUZHOU) Limited and Tenfold Technologies, LLC.
TEE's three-year grant acceleration
TEE Turtle, LLC shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at TEE's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Tecat (Suzhou)
Tecat Technologies (SUZHOU) Limited
9 patents
- Tech Energy Produ…
Tech Energy Products, L.L.C.
9 patents
- Techno Dynamics
Techno Dynamics, Inc.
9 patents
- Technoimaging
Technoimaging, LLC
9 patents
- Teijin Aramid
Teijin Aramid GMBH
9 patents
- Teijin Chemicals
Teijin Chemicals Limited
9 patents
- Teknologisk Insti…
Teknologisk Institut
9 patents
- Tenfold
Tenfold Technologies, LLC
9 patents
- TEE Turtle ◀
TEE Turtle, LLC
9 patents
What this shows TEE holds 9 patents at rank #30,303, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near TEE
By rank, the assignees closest to #30,303 in granted patent volume.
- Tecat Technologies (SUZHOU) Limited #30,299 · 9 patents
- Tech Energy Products, L.L.C. #30,300 · 9 patents
- Techno Dynamics, Inc. #30,301 · 9 patents
- Technoimaging, LLC #30,302 · 9 patents
- Teijin Aramid GMBH #30,304 · 9 patents
- Teijin Chemicals Limited #30,305 · 9 patents
- Teknologisk Institut #30,306 · 9 patents
- Tenfold Technologies, LLC #30,307 · 9 patents
Leaders in A63H (Toys)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in TEE's primary technology class.
TEE's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 19th percentile higher than 19% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2019 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2020 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2021 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2022 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2023 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2024 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 11.1% |
Which technologies does TEE Turtle, LLC patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
TEE Turtle, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- TEE Turtle, LLC's lead technology class is A63H (Toys, e.g. Tops, Dolls, Hoops OR Building Blocks), 55.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63H
- Ranked #30,346 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare TEE Turtle, LLC against Tecat Technologies (SUZHOU) Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 26.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.