Tech Mahindra Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Tech ranks #37,842 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #37,842
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 7th percentile
- by Innovation Score (20.4/100)
- 10.3
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R37842 · Foreign Corporation #37,842 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- LOWER-Q #37,842/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Tazi AI Systems
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 20.4/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 10.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Tazi AI Systems, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Tech’s 20.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Tech
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Tech Mahindra · this assignee 20
Tech Mahindra · this assignee
20 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Tech's Innovation Score is 20.4/100 (7th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Tech?
Each dot is one of Tech’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Tech’s own 10.3 claims/patent is at or below the 16.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Tech's grants concentrate
Tech Mahindra Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 42.9% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Tech sits between Tazi AI Systems, Inc. and Technology Innovation Institute.
Who files at Tech's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Tazi AI Systems
Tazi AI Systems, Inc.
7 patents
- Team Foods Colomb…
Team Foods Colombia S.A.
7 patents
- Tearclear
TearClear Corp.
7 patents
- Tech Group Europe
Tech Group Europe Limited
7 patents
- Tech Met
Tech Met, Inc.
7 patents
- Technelec
Technelec Ltd
7 patents
- IP
Technologies IP, LLC
7 patents
- Technology Innova…
Technology Innovation Institute
7 patents
- Tech Mahindra ◀
Tech Mahindra Limited
7 patents
What this shows Tech holds 7 patents at rank #37,927, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Tech
By rank, the assignees closest to #37,927 in granted patent volume.
- Tazi AI Systems, Inc. #37,923 · 7 patents
- Team Foods Colombia S.A. #37,924 · 7 patents
- TearClear Corp. #37,925 · 7 patents
- Tech Group Europe Limited #37,926 · 7 patents
- Tech Met, Inc. #37,928 · 7 patents
- Technelec Ltd #37,929 · 7 patents
- Technologies IP, LLC #37,930 · 7 patents
- Technology Innovation Institute #37,931 · 7 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Tech's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Tech's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
20 7th percentile higher than 7% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 4 | 57.1% |
| 2019 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 28.6% |
Which technologies does Tech Mahindra Limited patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Tech Mahindra Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Tech Mahindra Limited's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 42.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #37,842 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Tech Mahindra Limited against Tazi AI Systems, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 20.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.