Where does Team Worldwide Corporation rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Team Worldwide Corporation ranks #27,584 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Team Worldwide Corporation hold?

Team Worldwide Corporation holds 10 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2024, spanning 11 technology areas.

What is Team Worldwide Corporation's Innovation Score?

Team Worldwide Corporation has an Innovation Score of 38.1 out of 100 (top 42% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Team Worldwide Corporation focus on?

Team Worldwide Corporation's top technology area is A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds) with 6 patents, ranking #152 of 728 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 11 CPC subclasses total.

Is Team Worldwide Corporation's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Team Worldwide Corporation's recent grant velocity is -75% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Team Worldwide Corporation's patents?

Team Worldwide Corporation's patents average 19.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Team Worldwide Corporation patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Team Worldwide Corporation

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Team ranks #27,584 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 11 technology areas.

#27,584
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 42%
by Innovation Score (38.1/100): 19.1
avg claims per patent: -75%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R27584 · Foreign Corporation #27,584 · 10 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
MID-PACK #27,584/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Taizhou University
CPC-FOCUS A47C · 11 areas
INNOV-THIN 38.1/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.1 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -75% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Taizhou University (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Team’s 38.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.3 pts (22%) Velocity 6.7 pts (18%) Breadth 11.7 pts (31%) Claim depth 11.5 pts (30%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Team Worldwide · this assignee

38
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Team's Innovation Score is 38.1/100 (top 42% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Team?

Each dot is one of Team’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Team’s own 19.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Team vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Team's grants concentrate

Team Worldwide Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Team sits between Taizhou University and Tecogen Inc..

Team's three-year grant acceleration

Team Worldwide Corporation shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Taizhou University

10
Tannas

10
Tapco Internation…

10
Tata PTE

10
Tech Safety Lines

10
Techhold

10
Techsee Augmented…

10
Tecogen

10
Team Worldwide ◀

10

What this shows Team holds 10 patents at rank #27,619, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Team

By rank, the assignees closest to #27,619 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A47C (Chairs)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Team's primary technology class.

Team's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

38 Top 42% higher than 58% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Team Worldwide Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	4	40.0%
2016	1	10.0%
2017	1	10.0%
2018	2	20.0%
2020	1	10.0%
2024	1	10.0%

Which technologies does Team Worldwide Corporation patent most?

A47C - CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds 6

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 4

F04D - Non-positive-displacement Pumps 3

F04B - Positive-displacement Machines FOR LIQUIDS; Pumps 3

B05B - Spraying APPARATUS; Atomising APPARATUS; Nozzles 1

F04F - Pumping OF Fluid BY Direct Contact OF Another Fluid OR BY Using Inertia OF Fluid TO BE Pumped ; Siphons 1

G05D - Systems FOR Controlling OR Regulating Non-electric Variables 1

F21V - Functional Features OR Details OF Lighting Devices OR Systems THEREOF; Structural Combinations OF Lighting Devices With Other Articles, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

A63H - Toys, e.g. Tops, Dolls, Hoops OR Building Blocks 1

A61G - Transport, Personal Conveyances, OR Accommodation Specially Adapted FOR Patients OR Disabled Persons ; Operating Tables OR CHAIRS; Chairs FOR DENTISTRY; Funeral Devices 1

F16K - VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating 1

Top 11 of 11 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Team Worldwide Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Team Worldwide Corporation's lead technology class is A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47C
Ranked #27,584 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Team Worldwide Corporation against Taizhou University, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 38.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.