Where does Taylor Precision Products, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Taylor Precision Products, Inc. ranks #25,347 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Taylor Precision Products, Inc. hold?

Taylor Precision Products, Inc. holds 11 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2019, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Taylor Precision Products, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Taylor Precision Products, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 16.8 out of 100 (4th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Taylor Precision Products, Inc. focus on?

Taylor Precision Products, Inc.'s top technology area is B65B (Machines, Apparatus OR Devices FOR, OR Methods OF, Packaging Articles OR MATERIALS; Unpacking) with 1 patents, ranking #842 of 1,343 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

Is Taylor Precision Products, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Taylor Precision Products, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Taylor Precision Products, Inc.'s patents?

Taylor Precision Products, Inc.'s patents average 3.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Taylor Precision Products, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Taylor Precision Products, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B65B (Machines, Apparatus OR Devices FOR, OR Methods OF, Packaging Articles OR MATERIALS; Unpacking).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Taylor ranks #25,347 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 3 technology areas.

#25,347
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 4th percentile
by Innovation Score (16.8/100): 3.5
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R25347 · US Corporation #25,347 · 11 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
MID-PACK #25,347/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Tany Technology
CPC-NARROW B65B · 3 areas
INNOV-LOW 16.8/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 3.5 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Tany Technology Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Taylor’s 16.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.6 pts (51%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 6.1 pts (36%) Claim depth 2.1 pts (13%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Taylor Precision… · this assignee

17
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Taylor's Innovation Score is 16.8/100 (4th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Taylor?

Each dot is one of Taylor’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Taylor’s own 3.5 claims/patent is at or below the 8.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Taylor vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Taylor's grants concentrate

Taylor Precision Products, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 9.1% of grants classified under B65B (Machines, Apparatus OR Devices FOR, OR Methods OF, Packaging Articles OR MATERIALS; Unpacking). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (6 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2019. By volume, Taylor sits between Tany Technology Co., Ltd. and Technologies' Xanadu OF Resonatory-solar-systemed Co., Ltd.

Tany Technology

11
Tanya Taylor Desi…

11
Tate Access Floors

11
TAU Medical

11
Technechnophage I…

11
Technocrats

11
Humanware

11
' Xanadu OF Reson…

11
Taylor Precision… ◀

11

What this shows Taylor holds 11 patents at rank #25,330, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Taylor

By rank, the assignees closest to #25,330 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B65B (Machines)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Taylor's primary technology class.

Taylor's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

17 4th percentile higher than 4% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Taylor Precision Products, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	3	27.3%
2018	6	54.5%
2019	2	18.2%

Which technologies does Taylor Precision Products, Inc. patent most?

B65B - Machines, Apparatus OR Devices FOR, OR Methods OF, Packaging Articles OR MATERIALS; Unpacking 1

A45C - PURSES; LUGGAGE; Hand Carried Bags 1

B65D - Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR Fittings THEREFOR; Packaging ELEMENTS; Packages 1

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Taylor Precision Products, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Taylor Precision Products, Inc.'s lead technology class is B65B (Machines, Apparatus OR Devices FOR, OR Methods OF, Packaging Articles OR MATERIALS; Unpacking), 9.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B65B
Ranked #25,347 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Taylor Precision Products, Inc. against Tany Technology Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 16.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.