Where does Tate Consultancy Services Limited rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Tate Consultancy Services Limited ranks #37,827 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Tate Consultancy Services Limited hold?

Tate Consultancy Services Limited holds 7 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2021, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is Tate Consultancy Services Limited's Innovation Score?

Tate Consultancy Services Limited has an Innovation Score of 23.8 out of 100 (13th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Tate Consultancy Services Limited focus on?

Tate Consultancy Services Limited's top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 4 patents, ranking #7,209 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

Is Tate Consultancy Services Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Tate Consultancy Services Limited.

What does claim depth mean for Tate Consultancy Services Limited's patents?

Tate Consultancy Services Limited's patents average 12.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Tate Consultancy Services Limited patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Tate Consultancy Services Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Tate ranks #37,827 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 7 technology areas.

#37,827
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 13th percentile
by Innovation Score (23.8/100): 12.1
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R37827 · Foreign Corporation #37,827 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
LOWER-Q #37,827/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Tanous Works
CPC-NARROW G06F · 7 areas
INNOV-THIN 23.8/100
CLAIMS-RICH 12.1 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
SPAN-YRS 2020–2021 · 2y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Tanous Works, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Tate’s 23.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.2 pts (30%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 9.4 pts (39%) Claim depth 7.3 pts (31%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Tate Consultancy… · this assignee

24
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Tate's Innovation Score is 23.8/100 (13th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Tate?

Each dot is one of Tate’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Tate’s own 12.1 claims/patent is at or below the 16.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Tate vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Tate's grants concentrate

Tate Consultancy Services Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 57.1% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (5 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2020. By volume, Tate sits between Tanous Works, LLC and TearClear Corp..

Tanous Works

7
Tarapeutics Scien…

7
Tarpstop

7
Tascent

7
Taylor-winfield

7
Tazi AI Systems

7
Team Foods Colomb…

7
Tearclear

7
Tate Consultancy… ◀

7

What this shows Tate holds 7 patents at rank #37,921, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Tate

By rank, the assignees closest to #37,921 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Tate's primary technology class.

Tate's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

24 13th percentile higher than 13% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Tate Consultancy Services Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	2	28.6%
2021	5	71.4%

Which technologies does Tate Consultancy Services Limited patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 4

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 2

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 1

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 1

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 1

G16H - Healthcare Informatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR THE Handling OR Processing OF Medical OR Healthcare Data 1

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Tate Consultancy Services Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Tate Consultancy Services Limited's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 57.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #37,827 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Tate Consultancy Services Limited against Tanous Works, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 23.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.